CVE-2026-27137

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-03-07. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

When verifying a certificate chain which contains a certificate containing multiple email address constraints which share common local portions but different domain portions, these constraints will not be properly applied, and only the last constraint will be considered.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
49
EG Risk 49/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity75% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.6% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
49th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

March 6, 2026

Last Modified

September 18, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Jun 10, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

GO-2026-4599 - Go Packages

https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2026-4599
Web page

crypto/x509: incorrect enforcement of email constraints (CVE-2026-27137) · Issue #77952 · golang/go · GitHub

https://go.dev/issue/77952

Patch Availability(30)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatgrafana-0:9.0.9-13.el9_22026-10-06redhat
redhatgrafana-0:9.2.10-28.el9_42026-10-06redhat
redhatgrafana-0:10.2.6-23.el9_62026-09-15redhat
redhatgrafana-0:10.2.6-26.el10_02026-09-15redhat
redhatgrafana-pcp-0:5.1.1-9.el9_42026-09-14redhat
redhatgrafana-pcp-0:5.1.1-5.el9_2.22026-09-14redhat
redhatgolang-0:1.26.5-1.el9_22026-08-31redhat
redhatgolang-0:1.26.5-1.el9_42026-08-20redhat
redhatgrafana-pcp-0:5.1.1-15.el9_62026-08-18redhat
redhatgrafana-pcp-0:5.3.0-1.el10_02026-08-18redhat
redhatetcd-0:3.3.23-22.el8ost2026-08-13redhat
redhatgolang-0:1.26.5-1.el9_62026-08-03redhat
redhatgolang-0:1.26.5-1.el10_02026-08-03redhat
redhatdelve-0:1.26.1-1.el10_02026-08-03redhat
redhatrhmtc/openshift-migration-registry-rhel8:17839142762026-07-20redhat
redhatflightctl-0:1.1.3-1.el9em2026-07-16redhat
redhatgolang-github-openstack-k8s-operators-os-diff-0:0.1.1-18.0.20260602234716.a95ae05.el9ost2026-07-15redhat
redhatflightctl-0:1.0.3-1.el9em2026-07-08redhat
redhatoadp/oadp-velero-rhel9:17798095982026-06-25redhat
redhatgvisor-tap-vsock-6:0.8.5-2.el9_6.22026-06-22redhat
redhatetcd-0:3.4.26-9.5.el9ost2026-06-22redhat
redhatoadp/oadp-velero-rhel9:17798080272026-06-17redhat
redhatopenshift-logging/eventrouter-rhel9:17811928912026-06-17redhat
redhatimage-builder-0:52.1-1.el9_82026-06-04redhat
redhatmulticluster-globalhub/multicluster-globalhub-agent-rhel9:17803208092026-06-04redhat
redhatopenshift-logging/eventrouter-rhel9:17800516402026-06-03redhat
redhatimage-builder-0:52.1-1.el10_22026-06-03redhat
redhatosbuild-composer-0:165.1-2.el9_82026-06-03redhat
redhatosbuild-composer-0:165.1-2.el10_22026-06-02redhat
redhatmulticluster-globalhub/multicluster-globalhub-agent-rhel9:17792106752026-06-02redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
golang-1.261.26.0-1, 1.26~rc2-1, 1.26~rc3-1, 1.26~rc3-2
  • every version up to 1.26.1-1: fixed in 1.26.1-1
—
Go(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
stdlib—
  • 1.26.0-0 up to 1.26.1: fixed in 1.26.1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(25)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 32× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 97 of 386 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 3 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 289 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  2. 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  3. 2026-10-18 03:51 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  5. 2026-10-17 16:32 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-17 16:32 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-17 16:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7hfw-r8qc-89v4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  8. 2026-10-16 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  9. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  10. 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  11. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  12. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  13. 2026-10-12 16:17 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-11 20:00 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-11 17:13 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-11 14:44 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  18. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  19. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  20. 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  21. 2026-10-08 06:35 UTCOSV refresh
  22. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  23. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  24. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  25. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
Show 72 more
  1. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  2. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  3. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  4. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  5. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  6. 2026-09-26 00:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  7. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  8. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  9. 2026-09-18 12:20 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-09-18 12:20 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-09-18 12:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7hfw-r8qc-89v4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  12. 2026-09-17 19:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  13. 2026-09-17 12:11 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-17 12:11 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-09-17 12:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7hfw-r8qc-89v4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  16. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  17. 2026-09-16 13:48 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-09-16 13:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7hfw-r8qc-89v4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  19. 2026-09-16 12:21 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-16 12:21 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-09-16 12:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7hfw-r8qc-89v4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  22. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  23. 2026-09-15 12:32 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-09-15 12:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7hfw-r8qc-89v4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  25. 2026-09-15 12:14 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-09-15 12:14 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-09-15 12:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7hfw-r8qc-89v4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  28. 2026-09-14 13:39 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-09-14 13:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7hfw-r8qc-89v4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  30. 2026-09-14 12:36 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-09-14 12:36 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-09-14 12:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7hfw-r8qc-89v4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  33. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  34. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  35. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  36. 2026-09-11 12:26 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-09-11 12:26 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-09-11 12:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7hfw-r8qc-89v4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  39. 2026-09-10 13:22 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-09-10 13:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7hfw-r8qc-89v4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  41. 2026-09-10 12:28 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-10 12:28 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-09-10 12:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7hfw-r8qc-89v4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  44. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  45. 2026-09-09 13:42 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-09-09 13:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7hfw-r8qc-89v4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  47. 2026-09-09 12:41 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-09-09 12:41 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-09-09 12:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7hfw-r8qc-89v4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  50. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  51. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  52. 2026-09-07 14:03 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-09-07 14:03 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-09-07 14:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7hfw-r8qc-89v4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  55. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  56. 2026-09-04 13:30 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-09-04 13:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7hfw-r8qc-89v4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  58. 2026-09-04 12:26 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-09-04 12:26 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-09-04 12:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7hfw-r8qc-89v4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  61. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  62. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  63. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  64. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  65. 2026-08-31 13:37 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-08-31 13:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7hfw-r8qc-89v4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  67. 2026-08-31 12:32 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-08-31 12:32 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-08-31 12:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7hfw-r8qc-89v4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  70. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  71. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  72. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-27137?
CVE-2026-27137 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on March 6, 2026. When verifying a certificate chain which contains a certificate containing multiple email address constraints which share common local portions but different domain portions, these constraints will not be properly applied, and only the last constraint will be considered.
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-27137 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-27137 was published on March 6, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 18, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-27137 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-27137 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (49th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-27137?
CVE-2026-27137 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-27137?
A fix for CVE-2026-27137 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-27137 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-27137

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-27137?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.