CVE-2026-31649

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-04-24. a secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: stmmac: fix integer underflow in chain mode

The jumbo_frm() chain-mode implementation unconditionally computes

len = nopaged_len - bmax;

where nopaged_len = skb_headlen(skb) (linear bytes only) and bmax is BUF_SIZE_8KiB or BUF_SIZE_2KiB. However, the caller stmmac_xmit() decides to invoke jumbo_frm() based on skb->len (total length including page fragments):

is_jumbo = stmmac_is_jumbo_frm(priv, skb->len, enh_desc);

When a packet has a small linear portion (nopaged_len <= bmax) but a large total length due to page fragments (skb->len > bmax), the subtraction wraps as an unsigned integer, producing a huge len value (~0xFFFFxxxx). This causes the while (len != 0) loop to execute hundreds of thousands of iterations, passing skb->data + bmax * i pointers far beyond the skb buffer to dma_map_single(). On IOMMU-less SoCs (the typical deployment for stmmac), this maps arbitrary kernel memory to the DMA engine, constituting a kernel memory disclosure and potential memory corruption from hardware.

Fix this by introducing a buf_len local variable clamped to min(nopaged_len, bmax). Computing len = nopaged_len - buf_len is then always safe: it is zero when the linear portion fits within a single descriptor, causing the while (len != 0) loop to be skipped naturally, and the fragment loop in stmmac_xmit() handles page fragments afterward.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8(medium)
EG Risk
49(Track)
EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity98% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
37%
KEV
Not listed

Published

April 24, 2026

Last Modified

July 14, 2026

Advisory Details (10)

Auto-updated Jul 25, 2026
⚠️ Active exploitation confirmed. No patch confirmed yet.
generic

net: stmmac: fix integer underflow in chain mode - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b7b8012193fd98236d7ae05d4b553f010a77b2ef
generic

net: stmmac: fix integer underflow in chain mode - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a2b68a9a476b9544ff31f1fbcd5d80867a8a5e2f
generic

net: stmmac: fix integer underflow in chain mode - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6fca757c20396dc2e604dcc61922264e9e3dc803
generic

net: stmmac: fix integer underflow in chain mode - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/51f4e090b9f87b40c21b6daadb5c06e6c0a07b67
generic

net: stmmac: fix integer underflow in chain mode - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/513e06735f5be575b409d195822195348b164e48
generic

net: stmmac: fix integer underflow in chain mode - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2c91b39912278d0878f9ba60ba04d2518b18a08d
generic

net: stmmac: fix integer underflow in chain mode - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/275bdf762e82082f064e60a92448fa2ac43cf95b
generic

net: stmmac: fix integer underflow in chain mode - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/10d12b9240ebf96c785f0e2e4228318cd5f3a3eb

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-31649(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 5.10.253osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 44× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 255 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-23 03:08 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-20 22:32 UTCOSV refresh
  14. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-15 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-15 06:35 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-06-15 06:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-06-15 02:06 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-06-15 02:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-06-14 23:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-14 20:50 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-06-14 20:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-06-14 16:38 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-06-14 16:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-06-14 11:49 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-06-14 11:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-12 12:19 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-06-12 12:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-06-12 06:30 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-06-12 06:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-06-12 02:20 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-06-12 02:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-06-11 22:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-06-11 17:58 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-06-11 17:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-11 13:46 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-06-11 13:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-10 20:59 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-06-10 20:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-06-10 16:34 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-06-10 16:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  73. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-10 12:24 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-06-10 12:24 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-31649?
CVE-2026-31649 is a critical vulnerability published on April 24, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: stmmac: fix integer underflow in chain mode The jumbo_frm() chain-mode implementation unconditionally computes len = nopaged_len - bmax; where nopagedlen = skbheadlen(skb) (linear bytes only) and bmax is BUFSIZE8KiB or…
When was CVE-2026-31649 disclosed?
CVE-2026-31649 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on April 24, 2026, with the most recent update on July 14, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-31649 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-31649 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 62.7% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-31649?
CVE-2026-31649 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-31649?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-31649, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-31649

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-31649?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.