In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: macb: use the current queue number for stats
There's a potential mismatch between the memory reserved for statistics
and the amount of memory written.
gem_get_sset_count() correctly computes the number of stats based on the
active queues, whereas gem_get_ethtool_stats() indiscriminately copies
data using the maximum number of queues, and in the case the number of
active queues is less than MACB_MAX_QUEUES, this results in a OOB write
as observed in the KASAN splat.
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: vmalloc-out-of-bounds in gem_get_ethtool_stats+0x54/0x78
[macb]
Write of size 760 at addr ffff80008080b000 by task ethtool/1027
CPU: [...]
Tainted: [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE
Hardware name: raspberrypi rpi/rpi, BIOS 2025.10 10/01/2025
Call trace:
show_stack+0x20/0x38 (C)
dump_stack_lvl+0x80/0xf8
print_report+0x384/0x5e0
kasan_report+0xa0/0xf0
kasan_check_range+0xe8/0x190
__asan_memcpy+0x54/0x98
gem_get_ethtool_stats+0x54/0x78 [macb
926c13f3af83b0c6fe64badb21ec87d5e93fcf65]
dev_ethtool+0x1220/0x38c0
dev_ioctl+0x4ac/0xca8
sock_do_ioctl+0x170/0x1d8
sock_ioctl+0x484/0x5d8
__arm64_sys_ioctl+0x12c/0x1b8
invoke_syscall+0xd4/0x258
el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xb4/0x240
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x68
el0_svc+0x40/0xf8
el0t_64_sync_handler+0xa0/0xe8
el0t_64_sync+0x1b0/0x1b8
The buggy address belongs to a 1-page vmalloc region starting at
0xffff80008080b000 allocated at dev_ethtool+0x11f0/0x38c0
The buggy address belongs to the physical page:
page: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000
index:0xffff00000a333000 pfn:0xa333
flags: 0x7fffc000000000(node=0|zone=0|lastcpupid=0x1ffff)
raw: 007fffc000000000 0000000000000000 dead000000000122 0000000000000000
raw: ffff00000a333000 0000000000000000 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
Memory state around the buggy address:
ffff80008080b080: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
ffff80008080b100: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>ffff80008080b180: 00 00 00 00 00 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8
^
ffff80008080b200: f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8
ffff80008080b280: f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8
==================================================================
Fix it by making sure the copied size only considers the active number of
queues.
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-28). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it