iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. In versions up to and including 2.3.1.4, heap-buffer-overflow read occurs during CIccTagTextDescription::Release() when strlen() reads past a heap buffer while parsing ICC profile XML text description tags, causing a crash. Commit 29d088840b962a7cdd35993dfabc2cb35a049847 fixes the issue. No known workarounds are available.
CVE-2026-27692
This high-severity CVE scores 7.1 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit-prediction score not yet available (the EPSS model rescores nightly; freshly-published CVEs typically appear within 48 hours). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 7.1
- EG Score
- 7.1(low)
- EG Risk
- 36(Track)EG Risk 36/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity71% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability30% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 6%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
February 25, 2026
Last Modified
June 17, 2026
References (4)
- security-advisories@githubhttps://github.com/InternationalColorConsortium/iccDEV/commit/29d088840b962a7cdd35993dfabc2cb35a049847
- security-advisories@githubhttps://github.com/InternationalColorConsortium/iccDEV/issues/609
- security-advisories@githubhttps://github.com/InternationalColorConsortium/iccDEV/pull/610
- security-advisories@githubhttps://github.com/InternationalColorConsortium/iccDEV/security/advisories/GHSA-3869-prw8-gjqr
Weakness Classification(3)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 6× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-08-01 04:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-28 15:36 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-27 14:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-27 13:57 UTCOSV refresh
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-125 · CWE-787
- CVE-2009-2523EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2004-0978EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2004-1287EG 10.0EPSS p97HIGH
- CVE-2004-0574EG 10.0EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2002-2227EG 10.0HIGH
- CVE-2007-0158EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2007-0899EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-1999-0006EG 9.8EPSS p96CRITICAL
- CVE-2010-20115EG 9.3CRITICAL
- CVE-2010-4643EG 9.3EPSS p95HIGH
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-27692?
When was CVE-2026-27692 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-27692 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-27692?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-27692?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-27692
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-27692?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.