A flaw was found in rubygem-foreman_remote_execution. A command injection vulnerability exists in the Red Hat Satellite API (/api/v2/job_invocations). When a job template has the effective_user property marked as overridable: true, the application fails to properly sanitize the effective_user input provided during the API request. The exploitation does not rely on the content or logic of the Job Template/playbook itself; rather, the injection occurs during the instantiation of the job execution environment by the Satellite server. An attacker with permissions to execute job templates can inject arbitrary shell commands into this parameter, which are executed on the target infrastructure with the privileges of the execution user.
CVE-2026-12405
Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-10-01. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.8
- EG Score
- 8.8HIGHhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 40EG Risk 40/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity88% × 45%Exploitation2% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 1.5%
- EPSS %ILE
- 73rd
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
October 1, 2026
Last Modified
October 2, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Oct 1, 20262488952 – (CVE-2026-12405) CVE-2026-12405 rubygem-foreman_remote_execution: command injection in job invocations via effective_user parameter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2488952CVE-2026-12405 - Red Hat Customer Portal
Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 or OpenShift Container Platform 4, is affected by this vulnerability and a fix may be released to a
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-12405Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-12405(5)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:74506Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Satellite 6.16.14 Async Update
- RHSA-2026:74505Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Satellite 6.17.12 Async Update
- RHSA-2026:74504Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Satellite 6.18.10 Async Update
- GHSA-9jhx-3c73-g9rhGitHub Security AdvisoriesHigh
A flaw was found in rubygem-foreman_remote_execution. A command injection vulnerability exists in...
- RHSA-2026:74503Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Satellite 6.19.5 Async Update
Patch Availability(4)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | rubygem-foreman_remote_execution-0:16.2.3-2.el9sat | 2026-10-01 | redhat |
| redhat | rubygem-foreman_remote_execution-0:16.5.3-2.el9sat | 2026-10-01 | redhat |
| redhat | rubygem-foreman_remote_execution-0:13.2.8-2.el9sat | 2026-10-01 | redhat |
| redhat | rubygem-foreman_remote_execution-0:15.0.2-2.el9sat | 2026-10-01 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 28× in last 7d / 28× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-04 04:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 04:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 16:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 16:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 16:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-03 05:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 05:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 17:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 17:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 17:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 17:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 17:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 17:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 12:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 12:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 00:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 00:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 00:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 23:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 23:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 20:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 19:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 19:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 18:23 UTCEG score recompute
Show 3 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-01 17:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 16:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 16:25 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:74503
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-12405?
When was CVE-2026-12405 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-12405 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-12405?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-12405?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-12405
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-12405?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.