Netty's HttpServerCodec (io.netty:netty-codec-http) in versions 4.2.0.Final through 4.2.16.Final and in versions up to and including 4.1.136.Final pairs each outbound response with an inbound request by calling pollMethod() once per response, including for 1xx informational responses. If a client pipelines an HTTP/1.1 GET carrying an Expect: 100-continue header followed by a HEAD request, the 100 Continue response consumes the queued GET method, so the subsequent 200 OK for the GET is paired with HEAD and its body is dropped, while the following 200 OK for the HEAD request is written with a body. This desynchronizes HTTP parsing on the connection: the GET entity is never delivered and the HEAD response body is interpreted as the GET body, resulting in response splitting and unsafe connection reuse. Fixed in 4.2.17.Final and 4.1.137.Final.
CVE-2026-100666
Score 7.3 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-09-26. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.3; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.3
- EG Score
- 7.3HIGHhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 64EG Risk 64/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity73% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 13th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
September 26, 2026
Last Modified
September 30, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Sep 26, 2026Netty 4.2.0 through 4.2.17 Response Desynchronization via HttpServerCodec | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/netty-4.2.0-through-4.2.17-response-desynchronization-via-httpservercodecHttpServerCodec response desynchronization · Advisory · netty/netty · GitHub
https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-2g6j-r8q9-5hr8Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-100666(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 34× in last 7d / 40× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-04 08:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 21:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 21:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-03 10:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 22:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 22:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 11:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 00:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 00:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 13:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 02:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 02:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 15:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 11:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 00:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 00:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-29 13:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 02:29 UTCEG score recompute
Show 15 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-29 02:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 15:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 15:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-28 04:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-27 17:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 17:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-27 16:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 16:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-27 12:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-27 01:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 01:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-26 14:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 13:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 13:30 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-100666?
When was CVE-2026-100666 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-100666 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-100666?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-100666?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-100666
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-100666?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.