Use of Insufficiently Random Values vulnerability in form-data allows HTTP Parameter Pollution (HPP). This vulnerability is associated with program files lib/form_data.Js.
This issue affects form-data: < 2.5.4, 3.0.0 - 3.0.3, 4.0.0 - 4.0.3.
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.4 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 1.9% (79th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
A fix is available — apply it.
Use of Insufficiently Random Values vulnerability in form-data allows HTTP Parameter Pollution (HPP). This vulnerability is associated with program files lib/form_data.Js.
This issue affects form-data: < 2.5.4, 3.0.0 - 3.0.3, 4.0.0 - 4.0.3.
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
July 18, 2025
June 17, 2026
Fix landed in form-data/form-data commit 3d1723080e65 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/form-data/form-data/commit/3d1723080e6577a66f17f163ecd345a21d8d0fd0These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Red Hat Security Advisory: RHTAS 1.3.7 - Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer Release
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Migration Toolkit for Containers
Red Hat Security Advisory: New container image: rhceph-9.0
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11.9 security update
Red Hat Security Advisory: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.6 security update
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-form-data | 3.0.0-2 |
| — |
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-form-data | 4.0.0-1 |
| — |
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-form-data | — |
| — |
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-form-data | — |
| — |
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| form-data | — |
| — |
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
RHSA-2025:16101 — Moderate
RHSA-2025:16113 — Moderate
RHSA-2025:18278 — Moderate
RHSA-2025:18744 — Moderate
Form-Data vulnerability
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 92 of 195 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 8 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 103 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 GitHub PoC). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
POC of CVE-2025-7783
Open source ↗redhat:RHSA-2025:18278 · redhat:RHSA-2025:16113 · redhat:RHSA-2026:2737
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-7783
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.