CVE-2025-40290

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2025-12-08. the CNA's CVSS baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
Trending — 5 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

xsk: avoid data corruption on cq descriptor number

Since commit 30f241fcf52a ("xsk: Fix immature cq descriptor production"), the descriptor number is stored in skb control block and xsk_cq_submit_addr_locked() relies on it to put the umem addrs onto pool's completion queue.

skb control block shouldn't be used for this purpose as after transmit xsk doesn't have control over it and other subsystems could use it. This leads to the following kernel panic due to a NULL pointer dereference.

BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 2 UID: 1 PID: 927 Comm: p4xsk.bin Not tainted 6.16.12+deb14-cloud-amd64 #1 PREEMPT(lazy) Debian 6.16.12-1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.17.0-debian-1.17.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:xsk_destruct_skb+0xd0/0x180 [...] Call Trace: ? napi_complete_done+0x7a/0x1a0 ip_rcv_core+0x1bb/0x340 ip_rcv+0x30/0x1f0 __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x85/0xa0 process_backlog+0x87/0x130 __napi_poll+0x28/0x180 net_rx_action+0x339/0x420 handle_softirqs+0xdc/0x320 ? handle_edge_irq+0x90/0x1e0 do_softirq.part.0+0x3b/0x60 __local_bh_enable_ip+0x60/0x70 __dev_direct_xmit+0x14e/0x1f0 __xsk_generic_xmit+0x482/0xb70 ? __remove_hrtimer+0x41/0xa0 ? __xsk_generic_xmit+0x51/0xb70 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0xe/0x40 xsk_sendmsg+0xda/0x1c0 __sys_sendto+0x1ee/0x200 __x64_sys_sendto+0x24/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x84/0x2f0 ? __pfx_pollwake+0x10/0x10 ? __rseq_handle_notify_resume+0xad/0x4c0 ? restore_fpregs_from_fpstate+0x3c/0x90 ? switch_fpu_return+0x5b/0xe0 ? do_syscall_64+0x204/0x2f0 ? do_syscall_64+0x204/0x2f0 ? do_syscall_64+0x204/0x2f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [...] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt Kernel Offset: 0x1c000000 from 0xffffffff81000000 (relocation range: 0xffffffff80000000-0xffffffffbfffffff)

Instead use the skb destructor_arg pointer along with pointer tagging. As pointers are always aligned to 8B, use the bottom bit to indicate whether this a single address or an allocated struct containing several addresses.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
4%
KEV
Not listed

Published

December 8, 2025

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Jul 30, 2026
Patch available.
generic

xsk: avoid data corruption on cq descriptor number - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c5ea2e50b5c9aa80c5b53526257540f0c26cd66d
generic

xsk: avoid data corruption on cq descriptor number - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0ebc27a4c67d44e5ce88d21cdad8201862b78837
generic Patch Available

#1118437 - kernel crash in interrupt after receiving an ip packet on veth from xsk from user space (CVE-2025-40290) - Debian Bug report logs

https://bugs.debian.org/1118437

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-40290(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(7)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

All Vendor Advisories

(6)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 45× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 140 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-05 12:51 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-05 12:51 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-05 12:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-04 15:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-04 10:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-30 06:25 UTCEG score recompute 7.80
  11. 2026-07-30 06:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-07-30 06:18 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.8 · severity → HIGH
  13. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-27 05:39 UTCOSV refresh
  16. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-23 02:55 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-20 17:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-10 00:17 UTCOSV refresh
  18. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-21 11:01 UTCOSV refresh
  48. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-14 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-06-02 03:09 UTCOSV refresh

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-40290?
CVE-2025-40290 is a high vulnerability published on December 8, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xsk: avoid data corruption on cq descriptor number Since commit 30f241fcf52a ("xsk: Fix immature cq descriptor production"), the descriptor number is stored in skb control block and xskcqsubmitaddrlocked() relies on it to put the…
When was CVE-2025-40290 disclosed?
CVE-2025-40290 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on December 8, 2025, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2025-40290 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-40290 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 96.3% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-40290?
CVE-2025-40290 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 7.8 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-40290?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2025-40290, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2025-40290

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-40290?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.