CVE-2025-68359

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2025-12-24. the CNA's CVSS baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: fix double free of qgroup record after failure to add delayed ref head

In the previous code it was possible to incur into a double kfree() scenario when calling add_delayed_ref_head(). This could happen if the record was reported to already exist in the btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_nolock() call, but then there was an error later on add_delayed_ref_head(). In this case, since add_delayed_ref_head() returned an error, the caller went to free the record. Since add_delayed_ref_head() couldn't set this kfree'd pointer to NULL, then kfree() would have acted on a non-NULL 'record' object which was pointing to memory already freed by the callee.

The problem comes from the fact that the responsibility to kfree the object is on both the caller and the callee at the same time. Hence, the fix for this is to shift the ownership of the 'qrecord' object out of the add_delayed_ref_head(). That is, we will never attempt to kfree() the given object inside of this function, and will expect the caller to act on the 'qrecord' object on its own. The only exception where the 'qrecord' object cannot be kfree'd is if it was inserted into the tracing logic, for which we already have the 'qrecord_inserted_ret' boolean to account for this. Hence, the caller has to kfree the object only if add_delayed_ref_head() reports not to have inserted it on the tracing logic.

As a side-effect of the above, we must guarantee that 'qrecord_inserted_ret' is properly initialized at the start of the function, not at the end, and then set when an actual insert happens. This way we avoid 'qrecord_inserted_ret' having an invalid value on an early exit.

The documentation from the add_delayed_ref_head() has also been updated to reflect on the exact ownership of the 'qrecord' object.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8(medium)
EG Risk
49(Track)
EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity98% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
1%
EPSS %ILE
44%
KEV
Not listed

Published

December 24, 2025

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Sep 16, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

btrfs: fix double free of qgroup record after failure to add delayed ref head - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/725e46298876a2cc1f1c3fb22ba69d29102c3ddf
generic

btrfs: fix double free of qgroup record after failure to add delayed ref head - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/364685c4c2d9c9f4408d95451bcf42fdeebc3ebb
generic

btrfs: fix double free of qgroup record after failure to add delayed ref head - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7617680769e3119dfb3b43a2b7c287ce2242211c

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-68359(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(7)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (174 versions)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.17.9-1 (85 versions)6.17.13-1

All Vendor Advisories

(6)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 25× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 192 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-17 19:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-15 03:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-14 05:50 UTCOSV refresh
  8. 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-26 14:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-26 07:13 UTCOSV refresh
  24. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-17 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-10 23:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-09 22:53 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-08-09 22:53 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-09 22:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-08 09:48 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-08 09:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-08 05:29 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-08 05:29 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-08 05:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-07 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-08-06 07:16 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-08-06 07:16 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-06 07:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-08-05 12:48 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-08-05 12:48 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-08-05 12:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-04 10:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-07-30 06:45 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-07-30 06:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-07-30 06:21 UTCEG score recompute 9.80
  41. 2026-07-30 06:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-07-30 06:18 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 9.8 · severity → CRITICAL
  43. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-07-27 04:09 UTCOSV refresh
  46. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-07-23 03:02 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-07-09 22:45 UTCOSV refresh
  75. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-68359?
CVE-2025-68359 is a critical vulnerability published on December 24, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix double free of qgroup record after failure to add delayed ref head In the previous code it was possible to incur into a double kfree() scenario when calling adddelayedref_head(). This could happen if the record was…
When was CVE-2025-68359 disclosed?
CVE-2025-68359 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on December 24, 2025, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2025-68359 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-68359 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 56.4% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-68359?
CVE-2025-68359 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 9.8 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-68359?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2025-68359, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-68359

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-68359?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.