CVE-2024-58060

HIGHNVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2025-03-06. NVD baseline CVSS 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf: Reject struct_ops registration that uses module ptr and the module btf_id is missing

There is a UAF report in the bpf_struct_ops when CONFIG_MODULES=n. In particular, the report is on tcp_congestion_ops that has a "struct module *owner" member.

For struct_ops that has a "struct module *owner" member, it can be extended either by the regular kernel module or by the bpf_struct_ops. bpf_try_module_get() will be used to do the refcounting and different refcount is done based on the owner pointer. When CONFIG_MODULES=n, the btf_id of the "struct module" is missing:

WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol module

Thus, the bpf_try_module_get() cannot do the correct refcounting.

Not all subsystem's struct_ops requires the "struct module *owner" member. e.g. the recent sched_ext_ops.

This patch is to disable bpf_struct_ops registration if the struct_ops has the "struct module *" member and the "struct module" btf_id is missing. The btf_type_is_fwd() helper is moved to the btf.h header file for this test.

This has happened since the beginning of bpf_struct_ops which has gone through many changes. The Fixes tag is set to a recent commit that this patch can apply cleanly. Considering CONFIG_MODULES=n is not common and the age of the issue, targeting for bpf-next also.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
35(Track)
EG Risk 35/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
10%
KEV
Not listed

Published

March 6, 2025

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Aug 4, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

bpf: Reject struct_ops registration that uses module ptr and the module btf_id is missing - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/96ea081ed52bf077cad6d00153b6fba68e510767
generic

bpf: Reject struct_ops registration that uses module ptr and the module btf_id is missing - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2324fb4e92092837ee278fdd8d60c48ee1a619ce
generic

bpf: Reject struct_ops registration that uses module ptr and the module btf_id is missing - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b777b14c2a4a4e2322daf8e8ffd42d2b88831b17

Patch Availability(4)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04-edge (6.11.0-26.26) @ oracular2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws (6.11.0-1014.15) @ oracular2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-lowlatency-hwe-24.04-edge (6.11.0-1014.15~24.04.1) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
linuxKernel @ 6.12.13osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(3)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 43× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 114 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-07 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-05 19:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-05 14:02 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-05 14:02 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-05 14:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-04 15:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-04 11:06 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-04 11:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-01 04:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-24 12:41 UTCOSV refresh
  23. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-23 02:45 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-20 17:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-08 15:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-07 08:21 UTCOSV refresh
  23. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-07-05 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-18 19:35 UTCOSV refresh
  51. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-15 17:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-14 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-58060?
CVE-2024-58060 is a high vulnerability published on March 6, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Reject structops registration that uses module ptr and the module btfid is missing There is a UAF report in the bpfstructops when CONFIG_MODULES=n. In particular, the report is on tcpcongestionops that has a "struct module…
When was CVE-2024-58060 disclosed?
CVE-2024-58060 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on March 6, 2025, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2024-58060 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-58060 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 89.9% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-58060?
CVE-2024-58060 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-58060?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2024-58060, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2024-58060

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-58060?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.