CVE-2024-57975

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-02-27. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: do proper folio cleanup when run_delalloc_nocow() failed

[BUG] With CONFIG_DEBUG_VM set, test case generic/476 has some chance to crash with the following VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO():

BTRFS error (device dm-3): cow_file_range failed, start 1146880 end 1253375 len 106496 ret -28 BTRFS error (device dm-3): run_delalloc_nocow failed, start 1146880 end 1253375 len 106496 ret -28 page: refcount:4 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000592787cc index:0x12 pfn:0x10664 aops:btrfs_aops [btrfs] ino:101 dentry name(?):"f1774" flags: 0x2fffff80004028(uptodate|lru|private|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0xfffff) page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio)) ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at mm/page-writeback.c:2992! Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 3943513 Comm: kworker/u24:15 Tainted: G OE 6.12.0-rc7-custom+ #87 Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022 Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space [btrfs] pc : folio_clear_dirty_for_io+0x128/0x258 lr : folio_clear_dirty_for_io+0x128/0x258 Call trace: folio_clear_dirty_for_io+0x128/0x258 btrfs_folio_clamp_clear_dirty+0x80/0xd0 [btrfs] __process_folios_contig+0x154/0x268 [btrfs] extent_clear_unlock_delalloc+0x5c/0x80 [btrfs] run_delalloc_nocow+0x5f8/0x760 [btrfs] btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0xa8/0x220 [btrfs] writepage_delalloc+0x230/0x4c8 [btrfs] extent_writepage+0xb8/0x358 [btrfs] extent_write_cache_pages+0x21c/0x4e8 [btrfs] btrfs_writepages+0x94/0x150 [btrfs] do_writepages+0x74/0x190 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x88/0xc8 start_delalloc_inodes+0x178/0x3a8 [btrfs] btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x174/0x280 [btrfs] shrink_delalloc+0x114/0x280 [btrfs] flush_space+0x250/0x2f8 [btrfs] btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x180/0x228 [btrfs] process_one_work+0x164/0x408 worker_thread+0x25c/0x388 kthread+0x100/0x118 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 Code: 910a8021 a90363f7 a9046bf9 94012379 (d4210000) ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

[CAUSE] The first two lines of extra debug messages show the problem is caused by the error handling of run_delalloc_nocow().

E.g. we have the following dirtied range (4K blocksize 4K page size):

0 16K 32K |//////////////////////////////////////| | Pre-allocated |

And the range [0, 16K) has a preallocated extent.

  • Enter run_delalloc_nocow() for range [0, 16K)
Which found range [0, 16K) is preallocated, can do the proper NOCOW write.
  • Enter fallback_to_fow() for range [16K, 32K)
Since the range [16K, 32K) is not backed by preallocated extent, we have to go COW.
  • cow_file_range() failed for range [16K, 32K)
So cow_file_range() will do the clean up by clearing folio dirty, unlock the folios.

Now the folios in range [16K, 32K) is unlocked.

  • Enter extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() from run_delalloc_nocow()
Which is called with PAGE_START_WRITEBACK to start page writeback. But folios can only be marked writeback when it's properly locked, thus this triggered the VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO().

Furthermore there is another hidden but common bug that run_delalloc_nocow() is not clearing the folio dirty flags in its error handling path. This is the common bug shared between run_delalloc_nocow() and cow_file_range().

[FIX]

  • Clear folio dirty for range [@start, @cur_offset)
Introduce a helper, cleanup_dirty_folios(), which will find and lock the folio in the range, clear the dirty flag and start/end the writeback, with the extra handling for the @locked_folio.
  • Introduce a helper to clear folio dirty, start and end writeback
  • Introduce a helper to record the last failed COW range end
This is to trace which range we should skip, to avoid double unlocking.
  • Skip the failed COW range for the e
---truncated---

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS
9.3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

February 27, 2025

Last Modified

October 23, 2025

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2024-57975(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(9)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(9)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 41× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-23 02:45 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-20 17:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-08 15:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-07 09:21 UTCOSV refresh
  24. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 65 more
  1. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-05 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-18 20:13 UTCOSV refresh
  25. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-15 17:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-14 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-05-30 10:37 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-05-30 10:37 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-05-30 10:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-05-30 04:54 UTCOSV refresh
  65. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-57975?
CVE-2024-57975 is a medium vulnerability published on February 27, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: do proper folio cleanup when rundelallocnocow() failed [BUG] With CONFIGDEBUGVM set, test case generic/476 has some chance to crash with the following VMBUGON_FOLIO(): BTRFS error (device dm-3): cowfilerange failed, start…
When was CVE-2024-57975 disclosed?
CVE-2024-57975 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on February 27, 2025, with the most recent update on October 23, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2024-57975 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-57975 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 9.3% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-57975?
CVE-2024-57975 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-57975?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2024-57975, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2024-57975

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-57975?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.