golang-jwt is a Go implementation of JSON Web Tokens. Unclear documentation of the error behavior in ParseWithClaims can lead to situation where users are potentially not checking errors in the way they should be. Especially, if a token is both expired and invalid, the errors returned by ParseWithClaims return both error codes. If users only check for the jwt.ErrTokenExpired using error.Is, they will ignore the embedded jwt.ErrTokenSignatureInvalid and thus potentially accept invalid tokens. A fix has been back-ported with the error handling logic from the v5 branch to the v4 branch. In this logic, the ParseWithClaims function will immediately return in "dangerous" situations (e.g., an invalid signature), limiting the combined errors only to situations where the signature is valid, but further validation failed (e.g., if the signature is valid, but is expired AND has the wrong audience). This fix is part of the 4.5.1 release. We are aware that this changes the behaviour of an established function and is not 100 % backwards compatible, so updating to 4.5.1 might break your code. In case you cannot update to 4.5.0, please make sure that you are properly checking for all errors ("dangerous" ones first), so that you are not running in the case detailed above.
CVE-2024-51744
This low-severity CVE scores 3.1 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.5% (41st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 3.1
- EG Score
- 3.1LOWmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 14EG Risk 14/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity31% × 45%Exploitation1% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.5%
- EPSS %ILE
- 41st
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
November 4, 2024
Last Modified
April 15, 2026
References (2)
- security-advisories@githubhttps://github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/commit/7b1c1c00a171c6c79bbdb40e4ce7d197060c1c2c
- security-advisories@githubhttps://github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/security/advisories/GHSA-29wx-vh33-7x7r
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2024-51744(6)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:3406Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: New container image: rhceph-9.0
- RHSA-2026:2769Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Ceph Storage 7.1 security and bug fix updates
- RHSA-2026:2737Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Ceph Storage
- RHSA-2025:11681Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.16.45 bug fix and security update
- RHSA-2025:11351Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.15.55 bug fix and security update
- CVE-2024-51744Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)Low
Bad documentation of error handling in ParseWithClaims can lead to potentially dangerous situations in golang-jwt
Patch Availability(5)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | rhceph/grafana-rhel10:1771399331 | 2026-02-26 | redhat |
| redhat | ceph-2:18.2.1-381.el8cp | 2026-02-17 | redhat |
| redhat | rhceph/grafana-rhel9:1770630607 | 2026-02-16 | redhat |
| redhat | rhcos-416.94.202507222002-0 | 2025-07-30 | redhat |
| redhat | openshift4/ose-powervs-machine-controllers-rhel9:v4.15.0-202507111906.p0.g088808b.assembly.stream.el9 | 2025-07-23 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang-github-golang-jwt-jwt | 4.4.3-1 ... 5.0.0-1 (6 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang-github-golang-jwt-jwt | — |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang-github-golang-jwt-jwt | — |
| — |
Go(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4 | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 34× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 206 total refreshes for this CVE.
- 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-08 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-07 07:05 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-06 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-02 16:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-29 15:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-27 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-26 15:57 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-26 15:57 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-22 14:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-19 15:40 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 19:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-17 19:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-17 12:50 UTCOSV refresh
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 05:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-13 16:45 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-12 14:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-10 09:33 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-08 21:58 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-04 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-02 14:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 04:37 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-30 01:20 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-29 13:13 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-27 14:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-26 14:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-18 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-13 01:00 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-12 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-10 23:58 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-09 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-07 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-05 19:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-04 15:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-04 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-03 10:34 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-01 04:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-01 04:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-28 08:54 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-27 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-23 02:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:2737 · redhat:RHSA-2025:11351
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2024-51744?
When was CVE-2024-51744 disclosed?
Is CVE-2024-51744 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-51744?
How do I remediate CVE-2024-51744?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-51744
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-51744?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.