CVE-2023-36830

MEDIUMNVD 6.36.3—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This medium-severity CVE scores 6.3 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (33rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, nvd
6.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 6.3Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

SQLFluff is a SQL linter. Prior to version 2.1.2, in environments where untrusted users have access to the config files, there is a potential security vulnerability where those users could use the library_path config value to allow arbitrary python code to be executed via macros. For many users who use SQLFluff in the context of an environment where all users already have fairly escalated privileges, this may not be an issue - however in larger user bases, or where SQLFluff is bundled into another tool where developers still wish to give users access to supply their on rule configuration, this may be an issue.

The 2.1.2 release offers the ability for the library_path argument to be overwritten on the command line by using the --library-path option. This overrides any values provided in the config files and effectively prevents this route of attack for users which have access to the config file, but not to the scripts which call the SQLFluff CLI directly. A similar option is provided for the Python API, where users also have a greater ability to further customise or override configuration as necessary. Unless library_path is explicitly required, SQLFluff maintainers recommend using the option --library-path none when invoking SQLFluff which will disable the library-path option entirely regardless of the options set in the configuration file or via inline config directives. As a workaround, limiting access to - or otherwise validating configuration files before they are ingested by SQLFluff will provides a similar effect and does not require upgrade.

CVSS v3
6.3
EG Score
6.3MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
29
EG Risk 29/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity63% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
33rd
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

July 6, 2023

Last Modified

November 21, 2024

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
sqlfluff1.4.5-2 ... 3.5.0-2 (10 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
sqlfluff—
  • every version up to 2.3.5-1: fixed in 2.3.5-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
sqlfluff—
  • every version up to 2.3.5-1: fixed in 2.3.5-1
—
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
sqlfluff0.0.1 ... 2.1.1 (105 versions)
  • every version up to 2.1.2: fixed in 2.1.2
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 26× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 185 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-10-10 19:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-10-08 17:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-06 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-10-03 14:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-30 16:26 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-29 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-28 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-27 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-26 15:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-26 00:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-23 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-23 07:45 UTCOSV refresh
  20. 2026-09-22 14:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-13 16:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-09-12 14:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-09-11 14:50 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-11 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-08 21:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-07 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-05 15:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-04 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-04 05:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-04 02:16 UTCOSV refresh
  9. 2026-09-02 14:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-30 19:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-30 01:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-28 21:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-27 14:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-26 14:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-24 14:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-23 00:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-20 22:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-18 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-17 14:06 UTCOSV refresh
  24. 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-16 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-08-16 02:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-08-15 01:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-08-13 21:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-08-12 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-08-11 13:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-08-09 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-08-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-08-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-08-04 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-08-04 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-08-03 10:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-08-02 08:45 UTCOSV refresh
  41. 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-07-27 14:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-07-23 02:24 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-07-22 23:11 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-07-16 17:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-07-15 16:19 UTCOSV refresh
  68. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2023-36830?
CVE-2023-36830 is a medium vulnerability published on July 6, 2023. SQLFluff is a SQL linter. Prior to version 2.1.2, in environments where untrusted users have access to the config files, there is a potential security vulnerability where those users could use the library_path config value to allow arbitrary python code to be executed via macros. For many users who…
When was CVE-2023-36830 disclosed?
CVE-2023-36830 was first published on July 6, 2023, with the most recent update on November 21, 2024. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2023-36830 actively exploited?
CVE-2023-36830 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (33rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2023-36830?
CVE-2023-36830 has a CVSS v3 base score of 6.3 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2023-36830?
A fix for CVE-2023-36830 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2023-36830

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-36830?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.