RHSA-2026:0316HighCVSS 8.8

Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.12.84 bug fix and security update

Published
January 15, 2026
Last Modified
August 24, 2026

🔗 CVE IDs covered (7)

📋 Description

CVE-2025-4953 — podman: Build Context Bind Mount CVE-2025-8677 — bind: Resource exhaustion via malformed DNSKEY handling CVE-2025-11561 — sssd: SSSD default Kerberos configuration allows privilege escalation on AD-joined Linux systems CVE-2025-40778 — bind: Cache poisoning attacks with unsolicited RRs CVE-2025-40780 — bind: Cache poisoning due to weak PRNG CVE-2025-52881 — runc: opencontainers/selinux: container escape and denial of service due to arbitrary write gadgets and procfs write redirects CVE-2025-59375 — firefox: thunderbird: expat: libexpat in Expat allows attackers to trigger large dynamic memory allocations via a small document that is submitted for parsing

🎯 Affected products2

  • Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.12
  • rhcos-x86_64-412.86.202601061735-0 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.12

✅ Remediation

For OpenShift Container Platform 4.12 see the following documentation, which will be updated shortly for this release, for important instructions on how to upgrade your cluster and fully apply this asynchronous errata update: https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/openshift_container_platform/4.12/html/release_notes You may download the oc tool and use it to inspect release image metadata for the x86_64 architecture. The image digest may be found at https://quay.io/repository/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release?tab=tags. The sha value for the release is as follows: (For x86_64 architecture) The image digest is sha256:9ea794d2dd24ff7377534edfb0447e5398a28919a84300cc79fe7bb8ae550d1b All OpenShift Container Platform 4.12 users are advised to upgrade to these updated packages and images when they are available in the appropriate release channel. To check for available updates, use the OpenShift CLI (oc) or web console. Instructions for upgrading a cluster are available at https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/openshift_container_platform/4.12/html-single/updating_clusters/index#updating-cluster-within-minor. Workaround: Avoid long-running build steps and overly permissive file permissions. Use RUN --mount=type=secret for sensitive data instead of bind mounts. Workaround: Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability. To reduce risk, restrict recursive queries to trusted or internal networks only, and apply rate limiting or firewall rules to prevent excessive or repetitive requests. Enabling DNSSEC validation helps reject forged records, while isolating recursive resolvers from authoritative servers limits the impact of potential cache poisoning. Active monitoring of CPU usage, query volume, and cache anomalies can provide early warning of abuse or attacks. Workaround: To mitigate this issue, ensure the SSSD Kerberos local authentication plugin (sssd_krb5_localauth_plugin) is configured and the an2ln plugin is disabled by adding "disable = an2ln" in a krb5 include file, for example /var/lib/sss/pubconf/krb5.include.d/localauth_plugin and make sure it is included in the Kerberos configuration. Apply vendor updates and follow Red Hat guidance for SSSD hardening. Workaround: While it is not possible to eliminate risk from this vulnerability, there are several options for reducing the risk. These include restricting recursive queries to trusted or internal networks only, and apply rate limiting or firewall rules to prevent excessive or repetitive requests. Enabling DNSSEC validation helps reject forged records, while isolating recursive resolvers from authoritative servers limits the impact of potential cache poisoning. Active monitoring of CPU usage, query volume, and cache anomalies can provide early warning of abuse or attacks. Workaround: Potential mitigations for this issue include: * Using rootless containers, as doing so will block most of the inadvertent writes (runc would run with reduced privileges, making attempts to write to procfs files ineffective). * Based on our analysis, neither AppArmor or SELinux can protect against the full version of the redirected write attack. The container runtime is generally privileged enough to write to arbitrary procfs files, which is more than sufficient to cause a container breakout. Workaround: To mitigate the issue, limit XML input size and complexity before parsing, and avoid accepting compressed or deeply nested XML. Use OS-level resource controls (like ulimit or setrlimit()) to cap memory usage, or run the parser in a sandboxed or isolated process with strict memory and CPU limits. This helps prevent denial-of-service by containing excessive resource consumption.

🔗 References (11)