CVE-2026-98287

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scoredTrending — 4 sources updated this week
—
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS v2: —Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

pppoatm: ensure a writable skb header and linear data

In pppoatm_send(), LLC encapsulation checks whether there is sufficient headroom for the 4-byte LLC header, but does not ensure that the skb header is writable.

Normal transmit packets passing through ppp_start_xmit() have their header unshared via skb_cow_head(). However, packets can also reach pppoatm_send() via PPP channel bridging (PPPIOCBRIDGECHAN) without going through ppp_start_xmit().

Use skb_cow_head() to ensure both sufficient headroom and a writable header before pushing the LLC header.

While at it:

  • Call pskb_may_pull(skb, 1) before inspecting skb->data[0] to prevent
out-of-bounds reads on zero-length or non-linear frames (e.g. from bridging).
  • Defer SC_COMP_PROT protocol compression until after pppoatm_may_send()
succeeds. This eliminates the temporary skb allocation on admission failure and completely removes the fragile "undo" heuristic at the nospace label, avoiding any risk of reading uninitialized headroom or performing an unbalanced skb_push().

CVSS v3
—
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
—
EG Risk
—
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
7th
KEV
Not listed

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 6, 2026

Last Modified

October 6, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-98287(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (360 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (183 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (181 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.8-1: fixed in 7.2.8-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 20× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 14:38 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-12 03:59 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-12 03:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m2p4-c77r-p2c7
  5. 2026-10-11 19:10 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 16:25 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  8. 2026-10-11 13:37 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  10. 2026-10-09 20:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  11. 2026-10-09 06:48 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-09 06:48 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-09 06:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m2p4-c77r-p2c7
  14. 2026-10-08 17:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  15. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  16. 2026-10-06 15:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  17. 2026-10-06 09:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m2p4-c77r-p2c7
  18. 2026-10-06 09:28 UTCNVD update
  19. 2026-10-06 08:54 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-06 08:52 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-98287?
CVE-2026-98287 is a vulnerability whose severity is not yet rated; its CVE record was published on October 6, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: pppoatm: ensure a writable skb header and linear data In pppoatm_send(), LLC encapsulation checks whether there is sufficient headroom for the 4-byte LLC header, but does not ensure that the skb header is writable. Normal transmit…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-98287 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-98287 was published on October 6, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 6, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-98287 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-98287 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (7th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-98287?
A fix for CVE-2026-98287 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-98287 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-98287

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-98287?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.