CVE-2026-98070

HIGHPre-NVD 8.18.1—
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 8.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-25. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
8.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 8.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/rds: acquire RDS_IN_XMIT in rds_tcp_reset_callbacks()

rds_tcp_reset_callbacks() quiesces the transmit path by setting the path state to RDS_CONN_RESETTING and then waiting for RDS_IN_XMIT to be sampled clear before swapping the underlying socket and calling rds_send_path_reset().

Sampling the bit clear is not the same as owning it: rds_send_xmit() can re-acquire RDS_IN_XMIT right after the wait_event() returns. Its state recheck after taking the lock is a store-buffering pattern (the resetter writes the state and reads the bit, the sender writes the bit and reads the state) and acquire_in_xmit() is only an acquire operation, so on weakly ordered architectures both sides can miss each other's write and the transmit path then runs concurrently with rds_send_path_reset() rewriting cp_xmit_* state - which is exactly what the comment above rds_send_path_reset() tells its callers to prevent.

Take the lock instead, hold it across the socket swap and rds_send_path_reset(), and release it with a wake-up at the end. The lock-ordering constraint documented above the wait still holds: the lock is acquired before lock_sock(), so a sender inside tcp_sendmsg() can never be waited on while we hold the socket lock.

Two details of the old code go away with the same change:

  • t_sock is now read only after the lock is acquired. The old code
cached it before waiting; the teardown in rds_conn_shutdown() releases that socket and clears t_sock, so a pointer cached before the wait can be stale by the time the accept path resumes. Reading it under RDS_IN_XMIT is what makes the exclusion complete once the teardown owns the same lock, which the next patch arranges; until then the teardown still only samples the bit, and the two paths remain as exposed to each other as they are today.
  • The old !osock early path called rds_send_path_reset() with no
serialization at all. It now runs under the lock like the normal path. The conditional RDS_CONN_RESETTING transition of the previous patch happens before the socket check either way: a path found without a socket is either still connecting (its reconnect worker blocked on t_conn_path_lock) and legitimately goes RESETTING -> UP on the new socket, or it has been torn down meanwhile and is dropped.

The in-function comment describing the old wait-based quiesce is rewritten to describe the lock-based one, and the stale block comment above the function (which still described a return value and an incomplete list of t_sock writers) is refreshed to name all four writers - the connect, accept, teardown and swap paths - and what serializes each of them.

CVSS v3
8.1
EG Score
8.1HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
41
EG Risk 41/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity81% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
38th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 25, 2026

Last Modified

October 3, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Sep 25, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

net/rds: acquire RDS_IN_XMIT in rds_tcp_reset_callbacks() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/02c5f9dc2efd823e061954d564ce00bacd1bebeb
generic

net/rds: acquire RDS_IN_XMIT in rds_tcp_reset_callbacks() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/062d9e008c67289e8e1b221ecdd8f9d60566d012
generic

net/rds: acquire RDS_IN_XMIT in rds_tcp_reset_callbacks() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8e4c3b7844c906c7097b4cfedd9dd1f48c9a6a92
generic

net/rds: acquire RDS_IN_XMIT in rds_tcp_reset_callbacks() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d625112564c3e980e02504270222b49b82690cee

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-98070(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (360 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (180 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.7-1: fixed in 7.2.7-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 51× in last 7d / 71× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-05 07:27 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-05 07:27 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-05 07:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-10-04 23:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-04 20:28 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-04 20:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-10-04 09:29 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-04 09:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-10-03 22:29 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-03 22:29 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-03 22:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-10-03 11:27 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-03 11:27 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-03 11:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-10-03 11:12 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-03 11:12 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-03 11:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-10-03 09:03 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-03 09:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-10-02 22:01 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-02 22:01 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-02 22:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-10-02 11:02 UTCVendor advisory
Show 46 more
  1. 2026-10-02 11:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-10-02 00:03 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-02 00:03 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-02 00:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-10-01 12:33 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-01 12:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-10-01 01:34 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-01 01:34 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-01 01:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-30 14:35 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-09-30 14:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-30 05:22 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-09-30 05:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-29 18:22 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-29 18:22 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-09-29 18:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-29 07:23 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-29 07:23 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-09-29 07:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-28 20:24 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-28 20:24 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-09-28 20:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-09-28 09:25 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-09-28 09:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-09-27 22:26 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-09-27 22:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-09-27 11:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-09-27 00:23 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-09-27 00:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-09-26 13:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-09-26 02:23 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-09-26 02:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-09-25 15:23 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-09-25 15:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-09-25 14:52 UTCEG score recompute▲ 8.10
  42. 2026-09-25 14:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-09-25 14:49 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 8.1 · severity → HIGH
  44. 2026-09-25 11:30 UTCNVD update
  45. 2026-09-25 10:27 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-09-25 10:27 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-98070?
CVE-2026-98070 is a high vulnerability published on September 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/rds: acquire RDSINXMIT in rdstcpreset_callbacks() rdstcpreset_callbacks() quiesces the transmit path by setting the path state to RDSCONNRESETTING and then waiting for RDSINXMIT to be sampled clear before swapping the…
When was CVE-2026-98070 disclosed?
CVE-2026-98070 was first published on September 25, 2026, with the most recent update on October 3, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-98070 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-98070 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (38th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-98070?
CVE-2026-98070 has a CVSS base score of 8.1 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-98070?
No fix for CVE-2026-98070 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-98070 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-98070

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-98070?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.