A flaw was found in Keycloak's Client Policies, specifically within the org.keycloak.protocol.oidc component. When certain condition providers (client-type, client-roles, client-attributes, client-scopes) are used to enforce security restrictions, the reject-ropc-grant executor is silently bypassed. This allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to obtain tokens via a Resource Owner Password Credentials (ROPC) grant, even when a policy is explicitly configured to block it. This bypass can lead to unauthorized access and information disclosure.
CVE-2026-9792
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 6.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-05-28. A secondary CVSS source baseline 6.5; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 6.5
- EG Score
- 6.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 44EG Risk 44/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity65% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 6.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.5% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.5%
- EPSS %ILE
- 38th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (6.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 6.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 6.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
May 28, 2026
Last Modified
June 26, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Jun 13, 20262482459 – (CVE-2026-9792) CVE-2026-9792 keycloak: Keycloak: Security restriction bypass allows unauthorized ROPC token acquisition
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2482459Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-9792(5)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:30050Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.13 Images Security Update
- RHSA-2026:30049Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.13 Security Update
- RHSA-2026:25098Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.3 Update
- RHSA-2026:25097Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.3 Images Update
- GHSA-33j3-g875-37rpGitHub Security AdvisoriesMedium
Keycloak Vulnerable to Improper Handling of Insufficient Permissions or Privilege
Patch Availability(3)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operator:26.4-19 | 2026-06-25 | redhat |
| redhat | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9 | 2026-06-25 | redhat |
| redhat | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operator:26.6-6 | 2026-06-10 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| org.keycloak:keycloak-services | 1.0-alpha-1 ... 9.0.3 (216 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 34× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 236 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 136 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-19 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-18 02:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-12 14:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-11 13:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 20:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-29 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-09-14 07:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 07:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-09-12 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-08-25 05:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 05:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-24 14:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-08-23 14:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 14:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-08-21 20:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 20:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-20 22:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-08-20 11:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 11:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-08-17 09:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 09:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 02:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 02:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-08-14 23:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 01:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-14 01:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-08-12 21:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-12 21:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-08-11 22:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 22:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-08-11 00:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 00:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-08-09 17:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 17:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-08-08 18:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-08 18:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownMaven:org.keycloak:keycloak-services
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:25097
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-9792?
When was CVE-2026-9792 made public?
Is CVE-2026-9792 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-9792?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-9792?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-9792
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-9792?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.