Without NO_SESSION_CACHE_REF, wolfSSL_get_session() does not return a session object but a ClientSession reference of the form {row, index, hash(sessionID)} into the process-global SessionCache, and ClientSessionToSession() validates it against that hash alone. Because the TLS 1.2 session ID is chosen by the server and sent in clear, AddSessionToCache() matches any other server's session on the same ID and overwrites the client-side entry with that server's master secret, cipher suite and version, while the handle continues to resolve; nothing on the write path compares the peer, the application's server ID or the WOLFSSL_CTX. Resuming through the handle then produces an abbreviated handshake in which no Certificate message is sent, so neither chain verification nor wolfSSL_check_domain_name() runs, and the attacker is accepted as the original server for the whole of that connection. Affected builds are those leaving NO_SESSION_CACHE_REF, NO_SESSION_CACHE, NO_CLIENT_CACHE and TITAN_SESSION_CACHE all undefined, which includes a plain ./configure, --enable-opensslextra and --enable-opensslall; fifteen integration options define NO_SESSION_CACHE_REF and are therefore not affected, among them --enable-all, --enable-distro, --enable-curl, --enable-nginx, --enable-haproxy, --enable-stunnel, --enable-wpas and the rest of the OPENSSL_COMPATIBLE_DEFAULTS family, and --enable-leanpsk, --enable-leantls, --enable-lowresource and --enable-tinytls13 disable the cache outright. The application must use the legacy reference flow, wolfSSL_get_session() or SSL_get_session() followed by wolfSSL_set_session(); wolfSSL_get1_session() returns the session object itself and is not affected, nor are wolfSSL_SetServerID() lookups. Only TLS 1.2 and below and DTLS 1.2 and below are reachable, since TLS 1.3 and ticket resumption with an empty ServerHello session ID both use a client-chosen cache key. The poisoned entry lives in the process-global cache, so it crosses WOLFSSL_CTX boundaries and persists until the entry is evicted or the session times out, 500 seconds by default. Releases v5.3.0 through v5.9.2 are affected; the fix adds a per-write generation counter to the cache and raises WOLFSSL_CACHE_VERSION from 2 to 3, so a cache persisted by an older build is rejected by a fixed one.
CVE-2026-94419
Score 5.4 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: LOW) published 2026-09-27. NVD baseline CVSS 5.4; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
An upstream fix is merged but not yet released — mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation) until the release ships, then apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 5.4
- EG Score
- 5.4MEDIUMhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 24EG Risk 24/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity54% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.Action: An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines until it ships, then apply the release. - EPSS PROB
- <0.1%
- EPSS %ILE
- below the 1st
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.
An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines until it ships, then apply the release.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
September 27, 2026
Last Modified
September 30, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Sep 30, 2026Certificate verification and session cache hardening
Fix merged in wolfSSL/wolfssl PR #11500 on 2026-09-21 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/11500Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-94419(2)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 22× in last 7d / 25× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-03 16:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 16:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 16:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-02 17:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 17:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 17:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 17:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 17:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 17:47 UTCEG score recompute▲ 3.10
- 2026-09-30 17:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 17:44 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 5.4 · severity → MEDIUM
- 2026-09-29 17:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 17:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 16:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 16:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 20:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 20:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-27 09:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 09:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 09:00 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-94419?
When was CVE-2026-94419 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-94419 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-94419?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-94419?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-94419
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-94419?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.