vm2 through 3.12.0 (fixed in 3.12.1) does not correctly handle a nullish this receiver in the apply trap of its bridge (lib/bridge.js): when sandboxed code calls a host-provided non-strict (sloppy-mode) function without a receiver — e.g. fn(), a detached method, fn.call(), fn.apply(undefined), Reflect.apply(fn, undefined, []), or fn.bind()() — the undefined receiver is passed straight through to the host call, and V8 substitutes the host realm's global object for this. vm2 then wraps and returns that object to the sandbox, giving sandboxed script a live proxy of the host global. This allows a complete sandbox escape: untrusted script can reach process and execute arbitrary code/commands on the host (for example via process.getBuiltinModule('child_process').execSync). Exploitation requires that the embedding application expose at least one non-strict host function to the sandbox; strict-mode and ES module host functions are not affected.
CVE-2026-93603
Score 10.0 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-09-18. a secondary CVSS source baseline 10.0; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 10.0
- EG Score
- 10.0(high)
- EG Risk
- 50(Track)EG Risk 50/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity100% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability30% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 37%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
September 18, 2026
Last Modified
September 18, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Sep 18, 2026vm2 before 3.12.1 Sandbox Escape RCE via Non-Strict Host Function | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/vm2-before-3.12.1-sandbox-escape-rce-via-non-strict-host-functionSandbox escape to host RCE via nullish this-receiver on non-strict host function · Advisory · patriksimek/vm2 · GitHub
https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/security/advisories/GHSA-j89j-5m6r-cr2qVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-93603(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 14× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-20 01:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-19 21:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-19 17:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 17:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-19 13:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-19 09:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-19 06:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-19 02:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-18 22:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-18 18:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 18:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-18 14:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 13:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 13:29 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-94
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-93603?
When was CVE-2026-93603 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-93603 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-93603?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-93603?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-93603
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-93603?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.