ArcadeDB versions before 26.9.1 fail to validate IPv6 transition addresses in the SSRF guard used by IMPORT DATABASE and server commands. Authenticated attackers can supply URLs resolving to NAT64, 6to4, or Teredo addresses embedding RFC 1918 or loopback IPv4 payloads to reach internal services and cloud metadata endpoints.
CVE-2026-93597
Score 7.7 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-09-18. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.7; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 7.7
- EG Score
- 7.7(high)
- EG Risk
- 51(Track)EG Risk 51/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity77% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 27%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
September 18, 2026
Last Modified
September 18, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Sep 18, 2026ArcadeDB before 26.9.1 SSRF via IPv6 transition addresses | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/arcadedb-before-26.9.1-ssrf-via-ipv6-transition-addressesIMPORT DATABASE / server command SSRF guard missing IPv6 transition address extraction (NAT64/6to4/Teredo), incomplete fix for GHSA-4w2m · Advisory · ArcadeData/arcadedb · GitHub
https://github.com/ArcadeData/arcadedb/security/advisories/GHSA-67m7-7w7g-mpmhVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-93597(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 15× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-21 02:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-21 02:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-20 15:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-20 03:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-19 16:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 16:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-19 05:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-18 18:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 18:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-18 18:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 18:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-18 14:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 13:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 13:29 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-918
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-93597?
When was CVE-2026-93597 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-93597 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-93597?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-93597?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-93597
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-93597?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.