Metabase through 0.63.18 fails to properly validate the unspecified address 0.0.0.0 in custom GeoJSON URLs, allowing unauthenticated attackers to reach loopback services. Attackers can save a malicious GeoJSON entry with 0.0.0.0 and trigger requests that return loopback service responses to unauthenticated callers.
CVE-2026-92813
Score 4.9 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-09-16. a secondary CVSS source baseline 4.9; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 4.9
- EG Score
- 4.9(high)
- EG Risk
- 38(Track)EG Risk 38/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity49% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 22%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
September 16, 2026
Last Modified
September 17, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Sep 16, 2026Metabase through 0.63.18 SSRF via GeoJSON URL validation bypass | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/metabase-through-0.63.18-ssrf-via-geojson-url-validation-bypassGitHub - metabase/metabase: The easy-to-use open source Business Intelligence and Embedded Analytics tool that lets everyone work with data :bar_chart: · GitHub
https://github.com/metabase/metabasemetabase/src/metabase/geojson/api.clj at v0.61.2 · metabase/metabase · GitHub
https://github.com/metabase/metabase/blob/v0.61.2/src/metabase/geojson/api.clj#L26-L47oss/metabase.md at main · geo-chen/oss · GitHub
https://github.com/geo-chen/oss/blob/main/metabase.md#finding-2-geojson-ssrf-bypass-via-0000-addressVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-92813(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 16× in last 7d / 16× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-20 13:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-20 13:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-19 13:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 13:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 14:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 14:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-17 19:32 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-17 14:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 14:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-17 13:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 13:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-16 21:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 20:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 20:34 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-918
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-92813?
When was CVE-2026-92813 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-92813 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-92813?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-92813?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-92813
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-92813?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.