A (D)TLS 1.2 client can accept a ChangeCipherSpec message before it has sent its ClientKeyExchange. No master secret has been derived at that point, so the client installs read keys derived from a known (deterministic) key and checks the server's Finished against that same key. An out-of-order ChangeCipherSpec can therefore be used by an attacker to complete the handshake in place of the server and send data the client accepts as authentic. The client's own traffic still uses correctly derived keys, so the attacker cannot read it, and the genuine server never completes the handshake. DTLS 1.2 clients are exposed because a datagram read can deliver the out-of-order records on its own. TLS 1.2 clients are exposed when the application supplies received bytes with wolfSSL_inject() or enables read ahead. For certificate suites, the attacker must be in a man-in-the-middle position. For PSK (Pre Shared Key) connections, any fake server can succeed without knowing the PSK.
CVE-2026-93304
This low-severity CVE scores 3.7 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.2% (8th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
An upstream fix is merged but not yet released — mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation) until the release ships, then apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 3.7
- EG Score
- 3.7LOWmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 17EG Risk 17/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity37% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.Action: An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines until it ships, then apply the release. - EPSS PROB
- 0.1%
- EPSS %ILE
- 3rd
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.
An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines until it ships, then apply the release.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
September 27, 2026
Last Modified
October 2, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Sep 27, 2026Only process CCS after CKE is sent. Fix verification logic for RPK. Clear legacy_session_id when using TLS 1.3. Forbid Certificate messages for PSK.
Fix merged in wolfSSL/wolfssl PR #11458 on 2026-09-18 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/11458Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-93304(2)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| wolfssl | 5.5.4-2 ... 5.9.2-1 (27 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| wolfssl | 5.7.2-0.1 ... 5.9.2-1 (14 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 25× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-04 23:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-02 18:51 UTCEG score recompute▼ 2.60
- 2026-10-02 18:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 18:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 18:51 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 3.7 · severity → LOW
- 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 18:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 18:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 18:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 18:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-29 17:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 17:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 16:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 16:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 20:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 20:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-28 10:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 10:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-27 10:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 09:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 09:20 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-93304?
When was CVE-2026-93304 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-93304 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-93304?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-93304?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-93304
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-93304?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.