CVE-2026-93304

LOWNVD 3.73.7—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This low-severity CVE scores 3.7 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.2% (8th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, nvd
Trending — 5 sources updated this week
3.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 3.7Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

An upstream fix is merged but not yet released — mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation) until the release ships, then apply it.

A (D)TLS 1.2 client can accept a ChangeCipherSpec message before it has sent its ClientKeyExchange. No master secret has been derived at that point, so the client installs read keys derived from a known (deterministic) key and checks the server's Finished against that same key. An out-of-order ChangeCipherSpec can therefore be used by an attacker to complete the handshake in place of the server and send data the client accepts as authentic. The client's own traffic still uses correctly derived keys, so the attacker cannot read it, and the genuine server never completes the handshake. DTLS 1.2 clients are exposed because a datagram read can deliver the out-of-order records on its own. TLS 1.2 clients are exposed when the application supplies received bytes with wolfSSL_inject() or enables read ahead. For certificate suites, the attacker must be in a man-in-the-middle position. For PSK (Pre Shared Key) connections, any fake server can succeed without knowing the PSK.

CVSS v3
3.7
EG Score
3.7LOWmedium confidence
EG Risk
17
EG Risk 17/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity37% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.
Action: An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines until it ships, then apply the release.
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
3rd
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.

An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines until it ships, then apply the release.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 27, 2026

Last Modified

October 2, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Sep 27, 2026
Upstream fix merged — awaiting tagged release. Sources: github_pr.
github_pr

Only process CCS after CKE is sent. Fix verification logic for RPK. Clear legacy_session_id when using TLS 1.3. Forbid Certificate messages for PSK.

Fix merged in wolfSSL/wolfssl PR #11458 on 2026-09-18 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/11458

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-93304(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
wolfssl5.5.4-2 ... 5.9.2-1 (27 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
wolfssl5.7.2-0.1 ... 5.9.2-1 (14 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 25× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-04 23:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-10-02 18:51 UTCEG score recompute▼ 2.60
  3. 2026-10-02 18:51 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-02 18:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-10-02 18:51 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 3.7 · severity → LOW
  6. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-10-01 18:49 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-01 18:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-30 18:14 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-09-30 18:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-29 17:36 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-29 17:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-29 16:54 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-29 16:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-28 20:50 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-28 20:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-09-28 10:55 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-28 10:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-27 10:20 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-27 09:20 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-27 09:20 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-93304?
CVE-2026-93304 is a low vulnerability published on September 27, 2026. A (D)TLS 1.2 client can accept a ChangeCipherSpec message before it has sent its ClientKeyExchange. No master secret has been derived at that point, so the client installs read keys derived from a known (deterministic) key and checks the server's Finished against that same key. An out-of-order…
When was CVE-2026-93304 disclosed?
CVE-2026-93304 was first published on September 27, 2026, with the most recent update on October 2, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-93304 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-93304 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (3rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-93304?
CVE-2026-93304 has a CVSS v3 base score of 3.7 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-93304?
An upstream fix for CVE-2026-93304 has been merged but is not yet in a tagged release. Until it ships, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation, then update to the release that contains the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-93304 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-93304

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-93304?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.