FreeRDP before 3.31.0 fails to validate client-supplied DesktopWidth and DesktopHeight values during GCC negotiation, allowing remote attackers to crash the server. Attackers can send crafted RDP packets with zero or oversized dimensions to trigger division-by-zero or assertion failures in multifragment update capability calculations, terminating the server process.
CVE-2026-91955
Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-15. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5(high)
- EG Risk
- 65(Attend)EG Risk 65/100SSVC: Attend
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity75% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%Action: Remediate soon — notable exploitation risk. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 39%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
September 15, 2026
Last Modified
September 16, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Sep 15, 2026FreeRDP before 3.31.0 Denial of Service via Desktop Dimensions | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/freerdp-before-3.31.0-denial-of-service-via-desktop-dimensionsFreeRDP: server stores client Core Data DesktopWidth/Height unvalidated in GCC negotiation — SIGFPE/assert-abort kills any default-build libfreerdp server pre-auth at Demand Active (CWE-617/CWE-369) · Advisory · FreeRDP/FreeRDP · GitHub
https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/security/advisories/GHSA-4464-r7qj-pgrxVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-91955(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 21× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-19 17:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 17:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-19 05:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 05:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 18:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-18 07:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-17 19:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 19:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-17 19:32 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-17 08:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-16 21:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-16 15:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 15:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-16 14:09 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 03:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 03:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-15 16:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-15 16:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-15 15:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-15 15:22 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-91955?
When was CVE-2026-91955 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-91955 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-91955?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-91955?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-91955
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-91955?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.