CVE-2026-89653

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-09-11. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ceph: reject export_targets ranks >= CEPH_MAX_MDS in mdsmap decode

MDSMap export_targets entries are monitor controlled. check_new_map() uses each entry as a bit number in a fixed stack bitmap, so a rank outside the protocol namespace can make set_bit() write past the end of the array.

Reject ranks outside CEPH_MAX_MDS while decoding the map. Do not validate against possible_max_rank here because maps may legitimately reference ranks beyond a temporarily reduced max_mds.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
44
EG Risk 44/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
The EG Score, 9.8 of 10.
Exploitation0.5% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
41st
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 11, 2026

Last Modified

September 14, 2026

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Oct 13, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

ceph: reject export_targets ranks >= CEPH_MAX_MDS in mdsmap decode - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c4addccd05bacbef2144b4db14853d0308a218ac
Web page

ceph: reject export_targets ranks >= CEPH_MAX_MDS in mdsmap decode - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/aedc9053d909508a5f56c3f49f885fc030df4730
Web page

ceph: reject export_targets ranks >= CEPH_MAX_MDS in mdsmap decode - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/96c3f5fbb0d5386e7111426f047f98cec4586674
Web page

ceph: reject export_targets ranks >= CEPH_MAX_MDS in mdsmap decode - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8c823bbab3c24e657469a84db96902ba82d4e8bb
Web page

ceph: reject export_targets ranks >= CEPH_MAX_MDS in mdsmap decode - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/736adee11af36e407ed902264f8b2fb5cf94b62f
Web page

ceph: reject export_targets ranks >= CEPH_MAX_MDS in mdsmap decode - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4d298880f82c42383b36946bafde7ccf4d804c9b
Web page

ceph: reject export_targets ranks >= CEPH_MAX_MDS in mdsmap decode - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3740c88ca9cb2210a8dbdd55ea4cec119fbe86fe

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-89653(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (360 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (179 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 65× in last 7d / 390× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 98 of 409 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 2 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 311 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  2. 2026-10-13 10:04 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-13 10:04 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-13 10:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  5. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  6. 2026-10-12 14:48 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-12 09:05 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-12 09:05 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-12 09:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  10. 2026-10-11 21:05 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-11 21:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-10-11 19:15 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 16:31 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-11 15:25 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-11 15:25 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-11 15:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  18. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-11 11:40 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-11 11:40 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-11 11:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  22. 2026-10-11 06:49 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-11 06:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-10-10 23:49 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-10 23:49 UTCVendor advisory
Show 73 more
  1. 2026-10-10 23:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  2. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  3. 2026-10-10 19:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-10-10 15:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  5. 2026-10-10 11:35 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-10 11:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-10-10 07:50 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-10 07:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  9. 2026-10-10 03:48 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-10 03:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  11. 2026-10-10 00:03 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-10 00:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  13. 2026-10-09 20:17 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-09 20:17 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-09 20:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  16. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  17. 2026-10-09 16:31 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-09 16:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  19. 2026-10-09 06:44 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-09 06:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  21. 2026-10-09 02:58 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-09 02:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  23. 2026-10-08 23:13 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-08 23:13 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-08 23:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  26. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  27. 2026-10-08 10:58 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-08 10:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  29. 2026-10-08 06:59 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-08 06:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  31. 2026-10-08 03:12 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-10-08 03:12 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-10-08 03:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  34. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  35. 2026-10-07 23:26 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-10-07 23:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  37. 2026-10-07 19:41 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-07 19:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  39. 2026-10-07 13:44 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-07 13:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  41. 2026-10-07 09:42 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-07 09:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  43. 2026-10-07 05:54 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-10-07 05:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  45. 2026-10-07 02:09 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-07 02:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  47. 2026-10-06 22:24 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-06 22:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  49. 2026-10-06 18:39 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-10-06 18:39 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-10-06 18:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  52. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  53. 2026-10-06 14:54 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-06 14:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  55. 2026-10-06 11:08 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-10-06 11:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  57. 2026-10-06 07:23 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-06 07:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  59. 2026-10-06 03:38 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-10-06 03:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  61. 2026-10-05 23:53 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-05 23:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  63. 2026-10-05 20:08 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-10-05 20:08 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-10-05 20:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  66. 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  67. 2026-10-05 16:22 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-10-05 16:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  69. 2026-10-05 11:46 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-10-05 11:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  71. 2026-10-05 08:01 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-10-05 08:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4wh-f6ch-5m9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  73. 2026-10-05 04:16 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-89653?
CVE-2026-89653 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 11, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ceph: reject exporttargets ranks >= CEPHMAX_MDS in mdsmap decode MDSMap exporttargets entries are monitor controlled. checknew_map() uses each entry as a bit number in a fixed stack bitmap, so a rank outside the protocol namespace…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-89653 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-89653 was published on September 11, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 14, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-89653 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-89653 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (41st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-89653?
CVE-2026-89653 has a CVSS base score of 9.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-89653?
A fix for CVE-2026-89653 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-89653 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-89653

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-89653?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.