CVE-2026-89490

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scoredTrending — 4 sources updated this week
—
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS v2: —Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ocfs2: fix readdir position truncation on 32-bit kernels

In ocfs2_dir_foreach_blk_el(), the directory cookie position is rebuilt with

ctx->pos = (ctx->pos & ~(sb->s_blocksize - 1)) | offset;

ctx->pos is loff_t (signed 64-bit), while sb->s_blocksize is unsigned long. On 32-bit kernels unsigned long is 32-bit, so the mask

~(sb->s_blocksize - 1)

is computed as a 32-bit unsigned value (e.g. 0xfffff000 for a 4 KiB block size). In the AND expression with the 64-bit ctx->pos, that unsigned operand is zero-extended to 64 bits per the usual arithmetic conversions, yielding 0x00000000fffff000. The high 32 bits of ctx->pos are silently cleared, even though directory size is allowed to exceed 4 GiB.

When readdir() crosses the 4 GiB boundary on a 32-bit kernel the position is reset back into the first 4 GiB block, making the re-validation path re-enumerate already-returned dirents indefinitely.

This is ocfs2_dir_foreach_blk_el(), the extent-list readdir path taken for all non-inline directories, so a directory large enough to cross 4 GiB reaches it.

This is the same class of bug that commit 3dce5bb82c97 ("exfat: Fix bitwise operation having different size") fixed in exfat, and the fix mirrors the equivalent ext4 fix in this series. Cast the operand to loff_t so the mask is 64-bit before the AND:

ctx->pos = (ctx->pos & ~((loff_t)sb->s_blocksize - 1)) | offset;

64-bit kernels are unaffected.

CVSS v3
—
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
—
EG Risk
—
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
6th
KEV
Not listed

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 11, 2026

Last Modified

September 14, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-89490(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (360 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (179 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

All Vendor Advisories

(1)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 53× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 14:48 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 19:15 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 16:32 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  7. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 09:48 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-11 09:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3jg7-r7pg-8654
  10. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  11. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  12. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  13. 2026-10-08 08:45 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-08 08:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3jg7-r7pg-8654
  15. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  16. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  17. 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  18. 2026-10-05 09:27 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-05 09:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3jg7-r7pg-8654
  20. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  21. 2026-10-02 10:09 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-02 10:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3jg7-r7pg-8654
  23. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  24. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  25. 2026-09-29 10:51 UTCEG score recompute
Show 33 more
  1. 2026-09-29 10:51 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-09-29 10:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3jg7-r7pg-8654
  3. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  4. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  5. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  6. 2026-09-26 10:55 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-09-26 10:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3jg7-r7pg-8654
  8. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  9. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  10. 2026-09-23 11:35 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-09-23 11:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3jg7-r7pg-8654
  12. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  13. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  14. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  15. 2026-09-20 12:17 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-09-20 12:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3jg7-r7pg-8654
  17. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  18. 2026-09-17 19:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  19. 2026-09-17 12:58 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-09-17 12:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3jg7-r7pg-8654
  21. 2026-09-16 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  22. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  23. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  24. 2026-09-14 13:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3jg7-r7pg-8654
  25. 2026-09-14 13:27 UTCNVD update
  26. 2026-09-14 12:30 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-09-14 12:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3jg7-r7pg-8654
  28. 2026-09-14 12:24 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  29. 2026-09-13 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  30. 2026-09-12 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  31. 2026-09-11 20:36 UTCNVD update
  32. 2026-09-11 19:51 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-09-11 19:49 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-89490?
CVE-2026-89490 is a vulnerability whose severity is not yet rated; its CVE record was published on September 11, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ocfs2: fix readdir position truncation on 32-bit kernels In ocfs2dirforeachblkel(), the directory cookie position is rebuilt with ctx->pos = (ctx->pos & ~(sb->s_blocksize - 1)) | offset; ctx->pos is lofft (signed 64-bit), while…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-89490 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-89490 was published on September 11, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 14, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-89490 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-89490 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (6th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-89490?
A fix for CVE-2026-89490 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-89490 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-89490

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-89490?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.