CVE-2026-89478

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-09-11. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

sctp: drop a chunk if its transport was removed

sctp_rcv() resolves the transport once per packet and leaves it in chunk->transport. The lookup reference, or the one sctp_add_backlog() takes if the socket is owned by userspace, keeps it around until the chunk has been processed.

An authenticated ASCONF DEL-IP can remove it in the meantime. sctp_assoc_rm_peer() takes the transport out of the association and calls sctp_transport_free(), which tags it dead and drops the reference the association held. There is a window on both paths: the packet can sit on the socket backlog, and on the direct path the lookup completes before bh_lock_sock().

The DATA chunk in that packet puts the removed transport back into asoc->peer.last_data_from. Once the packet is done that reference goes away and the transport is freed by RCU, so the next delayed SACK carries the pointer into the SACK chunk and sctp_outq_select_transport() reads the freed transport's state.

Drop the chunk in sctp_inq_push(), next to the existing rcvr->dead check. Both paths reach it with the association's socket lock held. The peer retransmits it.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
44
EG Risk 44/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
The EG Score, 9.8 of 10.
Exploitation0.5% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
42nd
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 11, 2026

Last Modified

September 14, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Oct 13, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

sctp: drop a chunk if its transport was removed - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d7cb5ad832095dc4becfdb2a36007ffd50e49fb0
Web page

sctp: drop a chunk if its transport was removed - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c6c86a5e62a4fec36692ddd64b9144b660f71f96
Web page

sctp: drop a chunk if its transport was removed - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/928fd7920ba37cc5637a211b9be979083413a2fa
Web page

sctp: drop a chunk if its transport was removed - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3fc072e7cb4a0ff251d13cfc2d24f62489cd9386
Web page

sctp: drop a chunk if its transport was removed - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3537961df2163258bddc230db0e18dc14e925ea6
Web page

sctp: drop a chunk if its transport was removed - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1035bdef1efb9b1076d1a57b81e08c637ff08ecc
Web page

sctp: drop a chunk if its transport was removed - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0422b092a3d43ca462932ff9f747731ca078d1d4
Web page

sctp: drop a chunk if its transport was removed - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/03a9d10ecf71f54b2af8020935f2033d4a132be5

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-89478(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (360 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (179 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 42× in last 7d / 220× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 238 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 138 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-14 01:24 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-14 01:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  4. 2026-10-12 21:37 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-12 21:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  6. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  7. 2026-10-12 14:48 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 21:37 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-11 21:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  10. 2026-10-11 19:15 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-11 16:32 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-11 15:46 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 15:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  14. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  15. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-11 11:43 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-11 11:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  18. 2026-10-11 06:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  19. 2026-10-10 20:09 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-10 20:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  21. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  22. 2026-10-10 16:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  23. 2026-10-10 12:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-10-10 07:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-10-10 03:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-09 23:22 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-09 23:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  4. 2026-10-09 19:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  5. 2026-10-09 07:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  6. 2026-10-09 03:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-10-08 23:27 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-08 23:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  9. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  10. 2026-10-08 12:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  11. 2026-10-08 07:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-10-08 03:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  13. 2026-10-07 23:49 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-07 23:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  16. 2026-10-07 19:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-10-07 13:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  18. 2026-10-07 09:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  19. 2026-10-07 05:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  20. 2026-10-07 01:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  21. 2026-10-06 21:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  22. 2026-10-06 17:09 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-06 17:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  25. 2026-10-06 13:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  26. 2026-10-06 09:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  27. 2026-10-06 04:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  28. 2026-10-06 00:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  29. 2026-10-05 20:49 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-10-05 20:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  31. 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  32. 2026-10-05 16:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  33. 2026-10-05 12:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  34. 2026-10-05 08:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  35. 2026-10-05 04:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  36. 2026-10-05 00:31 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-10-05 00:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  38. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  39. 2026-10-04 20:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  40. 2026-10-04 16:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  41. 2026-10-04 12:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  42. 2026-10-04 08:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  43. 2026-10-04 04:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  44. 2026-10-04 00:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  45. 2026-10-03 18:55 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-10-03 18:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  47. 2026-10-03 14:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  48. 2026-10-03 10:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  49. 2026-10-03 06:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  50. 2026-10-03 02:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  51. 2026-10-02 22:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  52. 2026-10-02 17:59 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-10-02 17:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  54. 2026-10-02 13:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  55. 2026-10-02 09:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  56. 2026-10-02 05:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  57. 2026-10-02 00:21 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-10-02 00:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  59. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  60. 2026-10-01 19:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  61. 2026-10-01 14:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  62. 2026-10-01 10:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  63. 2026-10-01 06:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  64. 2026-10-01 02:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  65. 2026-09-30 22:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  66. 2026-09-30 18:19 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-09-30 18:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  68. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  69. 2026-09-30 13:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  70. 2026-09-30 09:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  71. 2026-09-30 05:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  72. 2026-09-30 01:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  73. 2026-09-29 17:05 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-09-29 17:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  75. 2026-09-29 12:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-47r2-m88p-rgjm · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-89478?
CVE-2026-89478 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 11, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sctp: drop a chunk if its transport was removed sctp_rcv() resolves the transport once per packet and leaves it in chunk->transport. The lookup reference, or the one sctpaddbacklog() takes if the socket is owned by userspace, keeps…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-89478 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-89478 was published on September 11, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 14, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-89478 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-89478 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (42nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-89478?
CVE-2026-89478 has a CVSS base score of 9.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-89478?
A fix for CVE-2026-89478 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-89478 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-89478

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-89478?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.