Temporal Server decided whether a Workflow completion callback was internal by reading a caller-supplied HTTP header. An authenticated caller holding only write permission in a single namespace could attach a completion callback whose URL host matched the configured callback address allowlist, whose URL path was any Temporal HTTP API route, and whose header map contained a non-empty header named source. When the History service delivered that callback, the non-empty source header caused it to re-target the request at the local frontend client and rewrite only the scheme and host, preserving the caller's path, query, and request body. Where an internal frontend is deployed with its HTTP API enabled, that client resolves to the internal frontend, which authorizes every request as a system administrator without requiring authentication information. The result is that the server performs an attacker-chosen state-changing HTTP POST against its own administrative API on the caller's behalf, in namespaces where the caller has no permission. The caller never needs network access to the internal frontend, because the History service makes the request. Confirmed effects include terminating Workflows in other namespaces, registering namespaces, modifying another namespace's configuration, and deleting another namespace and its Workflows. The affected routing logic is present in both the HSM and CHASM callback delivery implementations. This description and the CVSS score in this record describe releases 1.30.0 and later, where any non-empty source header is sufficient. Releases 1.25.0 through 1.29.7 are affected by a narrower form of the same defect in which the header must exactly match a configured cluster ID, a UUID that a namespace-scoped caller cannot read through the API. The consequence once that match occurs is the same, but the attack is materially harder and scores lower. To determine whether a deployment is affected, check two settings together: the static Server configuration for a non-zero services.internal-frontend.rpc.httpPort, and the effective per-namespace dynamic configuration value of component.callbacks.allowedAddresses. A deployment is exposed only when an internal frontend is deployed with a non-zero HTTP port, at least one allowlist rule admits a host, and authorization is enabled. The allowlist is empty by default, which denies all external callback URLs, and the stock static topology does not include an internal frontend. Note that a failed attach returns the error 'invalid url: url does not match any configured callback address', which proves only that one tested URL did not match and does not prove the effective allowlist is empty. To look for callbacks already attached, use DescribeWorkflowExecution, which returns callback information for a Workflow's registered completion callbacks. Operators should be aware of a gap when searching for evidence of delivery: the frontend HTTP API server records the request method and URL at debug level only, so at default log levels a delivered request is not written to the internal frontend's logs, and the absence of such log entries is not evidence that the issue was not exploited.
CVE-2026-87858
This high-severity CVE scores 7.2 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.8% (54th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.2
- EG Score
- 7.2HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 33EG Risk 33/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity72% × 45%Exploitation1% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.8%
- EPSS %ILE
- 54th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
September 21, 2026
Last Modified
September 22, 2026
Advisory Details (6)
Auto-updated Sep 21, 2026v1.32.0
Patch available: temporalio/temporal v1.32.0
https://github.com/temporalio/temporal/releases/tag/v1.32.0v1.31.3
Patch available: temporalio/temporal v1.31.3
https://github.com/temporalio/temporal/releases/tag/v1.31.3v1.30.7
Patch available: temporalio/temporal v1.30.7
https://github.com/temporalio/temporal/releases/tag/v1.30.7[v1.30] Add Nexus callback source header inspection toggle
Fix merged in temporalio/temporal PR #12085 on 2026-09-15 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/temporalio/temporal/pull/12085[v1.31] Add Nexus callback source header inspection toggle
Fix merged in temporalio/temporal PR #11982 on 2026-09-09 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/temporalio/temporal/pull/11982Make Nexus callback source header opt-in
Fix merged in temporalio/temporal PR #11965 on 2026-09-08 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/temporalio/temporal/pull/11965Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-87858(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 24× in last 7d / 55× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-05 10:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-04 21:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-04 09:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 20:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 20:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 08:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 19:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 19:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 06:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 06:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 18:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 05:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 16:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 16:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-30 03:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 03:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 15:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 02:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 02:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 13:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 13:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-28 01:27 UTCEG score recompute
Show 30 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-28 01:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-27 12:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-27 00:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 00:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-26 11:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 11:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-25 23:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-25 10:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-24 22:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 22:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-24 09:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-23 20:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 20:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-23 08:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-22 19:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-22 17:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 17:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-22 04:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-21 16:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-21 16:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-21 15:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-21 15:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-21 12:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-21 11:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-21 11:45 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-87858?
When was CVE-2026-87858 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-87858 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-87858?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-87858?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-87858
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-87858?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.