CVE-2026-86863

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-09-17. a secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

pgAdmin 4's Webserver authentication source is intended to accept an identity asserted by the web server or reverse proxy in front of pgAdmin, delivered through the WSGI/CGI environment. WebserverAuthentication.get_user() read config.WEBSERVER_REMOTE_USER from request.environ and, when that returned nothing, fell back to reading the same name directly from the inbound HTTP request headers via request.headers.get(). An inbound HTTP header is written by whoever sends the request, so any client able to reach pgAdmin could supply that header itself and be authenticated as any username it named, including an existing Administrator, without presenting a password or any other credential. The environment lookup could also be satisfied by a client-supplied header whenever WEBSERVER_REMOTE_USER was configured to an HTTP_-prefixed or hyphenated name such as HTTP_X_FORWARDED_USER or X-Forwarded-User, since WSGI servers place inbound headers into the environment under exactly those names. Deployments are affected only when 'webserver' is enabled in AUTHENTICATION_SOURCES.

The fix distinguishes a genuine CGI/WSGI variable from a header-derived one and implicitly trusts only the former. A header-asserted identity is now accepted only when the operator explicitly opts in via WEBSERVER_REMOTE_USER_FROM_HEADER, the request arrives from a peer listed in WEBSERVER_TRUSTED_PROXIES, and, when configured, a shared secret supplied in WEBSERVER_SHARED_SECRET_HEADER matches WEBSERVER_SHARED_SECRET under a constant-time comparison. The trusted-peer check deliberately reads the real socket peer address rather than request.remote_addr, because ProxyFix rewrites the latter from the client-controlled X-Forwarded-For header and would otherwise allow an attacker to claim to be the trusted proxy. As defence in depth, login() now refuses any account whose auth_source is not 'webserver', so a misconfigured trust gate cannot be used to assume an internal or LDAP account.

This issue affects pgAdmin 4: from 6.2 before 9.18.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8(high)
EG Risk
59(Track)
EG Risk 59/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity98% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability100% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
30%
KEV
Not listed

Published

September 17, 2026

Last Modified

September 18, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Sep 18, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

Authentication bypass via a client-controlled identity header in Webserver authentication mode (CVE-2026-86863) · Issue #10383 · pgadmin-org/pgadmin4 · GitHub

https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/issues/10383

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-86863(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 16× in last 7d / 16× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-09-19 06:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-09-19 02:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-09-18 22:49 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-09-18 22:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-18 19:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-09-18 16:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-09-18 12:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-18 08:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-18 05:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-09-18 01:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-17 21:39 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-17 21:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-17 17:57 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-17 15:44 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-09-17 15:44 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-86863?
CVE-2026-86863 is a critical vulnerability published on September 17, 2026. pgAdmin 4's Webserver authentication source is intended to accept an identity asserted by the web server or reverse proxy in front of pgAdmin, delivered through the WSGI/CGI environment. WebserverAuthentication.getuser() read config.WEBSERVERREMOTEUSER from request.environ and, when that returned…
When was CVE-2026-86863 disclosed?
CVE-2026-86863 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on September 17, 2026, with the most recent update on September 18, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-86863 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-86863 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 70.4% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-86863?
CVE-2026-86863 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-86863?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-86863, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-86863

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-86863?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.