Colord is a tiny yet powerful tool for high-performance color manipulations and conversions. Prior to 2.9.4, synchronous CSS color string matchers in src/colorModels/rgbString.ts, src/colorModels/hslString.ts, src/colorModels/hwbString.ts, src/colorModels/lchString.ts, and src/colorModels/cmykString.ts use the ambiguous numeric regular expression ([+-]?\d*.?\d+), allowing the same digits to be divided between overlapping quantifiers in quadratically many ways when malformed input is rejected. An attacker who can supply an unbounded color string to colord(), getFormat(), isEqual(), mix(), or contrast(), including through a request body, JSON field, or uploaded stylesheet, can block the processing thread with a multi-kilobyte payload. The affected matchers are parseRgbaString, parseHslaString, parseHwbaString, parseLchaString, and parseCmykaString. This issue is fixed in version 2.9.4.
CVE-2026-85062
This medium-severity CVE scores 6.9 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3%, top 78% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 6.9
- EG Score
- 6.9(medium)
- EG Risk
- 46(Track)EG Risk 46/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity69% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 22%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
September 3, 2026
Last Modified
September 9, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Sep 3, 2026commit 87018089515e (omgovich/colord)
Patch available: omgovich/colord v2.10 (contains commit 87018089515e)
https://github.com/omgovich/colord/commit/87018089515ed66a85b1a95c3c7c3fd69a25bac2fix: reject malformed color strings in linear time
Patch available: omgovich/colord v2.10 (PR #141 merged 2026-08-19)
https://github.com/omgovich/colord/pull/141Slow rejection of oversized malformed color strings in colord · Advisory · omgovich/colord · GitHub
https://github.com/omgovich/colord/security/advisories/GHSA-2wm5-q62r-hmrvVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-85062(2)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
npm(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| colord | — | 2.9.4 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 20× in last 7d / 44× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-19 11:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 11:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 12:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 12:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 19:32 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-17 13:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 14:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 14:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 14:09 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-15 15:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-15 15:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-14 16:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 17:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 17:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 18:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 18:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 19:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 19:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-10 20:12 UTCEG score recompute
Show 19 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-09 21:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-09 18:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-09 18:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-09 17:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-09 17:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-08 23:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 23:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-07 17:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 17:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 18:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 18:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-05 19:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-04 20:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-03 21:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-03 20:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-03 20:38 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-85062?
When was CVE-2026-85062 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-85062 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-85062?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-85062?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-85062
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-85062?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.