CVE-2026-82617

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.4%, top 62% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, nvd
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

The two built-in name-finder patterns exposed by opennlp.tools.namefind.RegexNameFinderFactory - DEFAULT_REGEX_NAME_FINDER.EMAIL and DEFAULT_REGEX_NAME_FINDER.URL - contain ambiguous nested quantifiers. An application that obtains these finders through RegexNameFinderFactory.getDefaultRegexNameFinders(...) and then applies them to untrusted text through RegexNameFinder.find(String[]) or RegexNameFinder.find(String) can be driven into super-linear backtracking or into unbounded matcher recursion by a small crafted input.

For the EMAIL pattern, a long run of local-part characters that is never followed by an @ forces the matcher to re-scan to end-of-input from every starting offset. Cost grows quadratically with input length: an input of approximately 32 KB consumes several seconds of CPU in a single find() call and returns no match, and each doubling of the input multiplies the cost roughly four-fold.

For the URL pattern, the query-string sub-expression nests a capturing repetition inside an outer repetition. The JDK matcher recurses once per query token, so an input of approximately 4 KB containing many &-separated tokens exhausts the thread stack and causes java.lang.StackOverflowError to propagate out of find(), terminating the calling thread. On a thread created with a smaller stack (for example -Xss512k, typical of server worker pools) approximately 1 KB is sufficient.

In both cases an attacker who can supply text for analysis can convert a single request into seconds to minutes of pinned CPU, or into an abrupt thread death, denying service to the embedding application. No authentication, special configuration, or model file is required beyond the application having selected one of the two built-in finders.

This issue affects Apache OpenNLP: from 2.0.0 through 2.5.11; from 3.0.0-M1 through 3.0.0-M5.

Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.5.12, or to 3.0.0-M6 for users tracking the 3.0.0 milestone line, which fix the issue.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8(medium)
EG Risk
59(Track)
EG Risk 59/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity98% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability100% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
38%
KEV
Not listed

Published

September 11, 2026

Last Modified

September 16, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Sep 16, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

oss-security - CVE-2026-82617: Apache OpenNLP: ReDoS / stack exhaustion in RegexNameFinderFactory built-in EMAIL and URL patterns

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/09/11/10

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-82617(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 55× in last 7d / 67× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-09-19 20:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-09-19 16:16 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-19 16:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-19 12:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-09-19 08:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-09-19 04:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-09-19 00:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-09-18 20:13 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-18 20:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-18 16:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-18 11:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-09-18 07:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-18 03:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-17 23:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-17 19:42 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-17 19:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-17 14:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-17 10:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-17 06:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-09-17 02:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-16 22:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-09-16 18:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-09-16 14:16 UTCEG score recompute 0.20
  25. 2026-09-16 14:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 42 more
  1. 2026-09-16 14:16 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 9.8
  2. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-16 10:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-16 06:26 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-09-16 06:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-16 02:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-09-15 22:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-15 18:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-15 14:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-09-15 10:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-15 06:20 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-15 06:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-15 02:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-14 22:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-14 18:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-14 13:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-14 09:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-09-14 05:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-14 01:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-09-13 21:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-09-13 17:27 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-13 17:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-09-13 13:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-09-13 09:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-09-13 05:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-09-13 01:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-09-12 21:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-09-12 17:24 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-12 17:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-09-12 13:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-09-12 09:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-09-12 05:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-09-12 01:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-09-11 21:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-09-11 18:34 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-11 18:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-09-11 18:04 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-09-11 17:54 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-11 17:53 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-82617?
CVE-2026-82617 is a critical vulnerability published on September 11, 2026. The two built-in name-finder patterns exposed by opennlp.tools.namefind.RegexNameFinderFactory - DEFAULTREGEXNAME_FINDER.EMAIL and DEFAULTREGEXNAME_FINDER.URL - contain ambiguous nested quantifiers. An application that obtains these finders through…
When was CVE-2026-82617 disclosed?
CVE-2026-82617 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on September 11, 2026, with the most recent update on September 16, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-82617 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-82617 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 62.2% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-82617?
CVE-2026-82617 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-82617?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-82617, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-82617

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-82617?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.