openssl_encrypt before 1.4.9 fails to re-derive and validate fingerprints when loading identities from identity.json, allowing attackers to substitute public keys in identity stores. Attackers can replace legitimate public keys with their own while maintaining the claimed fingerprint, enabling silent key substitution where encryption uses attacker keys and signature verification appears valid.
CVE-2026-81702
Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-08-27. a secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8(high)
- EG Risk
- 49(Track)EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity98% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability30% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 4%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
August 27, 2026
Last Modified
August 27, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Aug 27, 2026openssl_encrypt before 1.4.9 Key Substitution via Identity Load | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openssl-encrypt-before-1.4.9-key-substitution-via-identity-loadIdentity.load trusts the stored fingerprint without re-deriving it, enabling silent key substitution · Advisory · jahlives/openssl_encrypt · GitHub
https://github.com/jahlives/openssl_encrypt/security/advisories/GHSA-q8p3-7h6h-ghfrVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-81702(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 21× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-08-30 01:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 01:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-29 21:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-29 17:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-29 12:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-29 08:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-29 04:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-28 23:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-28 23:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-28 19:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-28 15:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-28 10:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-28 06:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-28 02:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-27 21:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 21:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-27 17:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 16:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 16:43 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-81702?
When was CVE-2026-81702 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-81702 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-81702?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-81702?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-81702
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-81702?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.