openssl_encrypt (pip: openssl-encrypt) versions 1.4.8 and earlier fail to validate the 36-bit STREAMINFO total_samples field of FLAC files before using it to size an allocation (np.random.randint(size=(total_samples, channels))). A ~50-byte crafted FLAC file declaring ~100 million samples causes a multi-gigabyte memory allocation, leading to out-of-memory denial of service during 'decrypt --stego-extract'. The issue is fixed in 1.4.9; both the 1.4.x and 1.5.x lines are affected.
CVE-2026-81692
Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-27. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5(high)
- EG Risk
- 38(Track)EG Risk 38/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity75% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability30% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 27%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
August 27, 2026
Last Modified
August 27, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Aug 27, 2026openssl_encrypt before 1.4.9 Denial of Service via STREAMINFO | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openssl-encrypt-before-1.4.9-denial-of-service-via-streaminfoFLAC total_samples drives a multi-gigabyte allocation · Advisory · jahlives/openssl_encrypt · GitHub
https://github.com/jahlives/openssl_encrypt/security/advisories/GHSA-wr9q-p3rj-vqq7Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-81692(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 11× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-29 21:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-29 08:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-29 08:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-28 19:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-28 06:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-28 06:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-27 17:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 16:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 16:43 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-81692?
When was CVE-2026-81692 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-81692 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-81692?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-81692?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-81692
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-81692?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.