openssl_encrypt (pip package openssl-encrypt) versions <= 1.4.8 advertise a portable USB workspace as an 'Encrypted USB Workspace' with AES-256-GCM encryption and write a marker declaring the workspace encrypted, but the workspace directory is actually stored in cleartext and the derived encryption key is never applied to it. A user who trusts the branding and places files in the workspace leaves them unencrypted on the removable media, so an attacker with physical access to the media can read the sensitive files. Fixed in 1.4.9, which seals the workspace into an authenticated AES-256-GCM vault.
CVE-2026-81681
Score 4.6 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-08-27. a secondary CVSS source baseline 4.6; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 4.6
- EG Score
- 4.6(high)
- EG Risk
- 21(Track)EG Risk 21/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity46% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 3%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
August 27, 2026
Last Modified
August 28, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Aug 27, 2026openssl_encrypt before 1.4.9 False Encryption via Cleartext Storage | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openssl-encrypt-before-1.4.9-false-encryption-via-cleartext-storagePortable USB workspace advertised AES-256-GCM encryption while storing files in cleartext · Advisory · jahlives/openssl_encrypt · GitHub
https://github.com/jahlives/openssl_encrypt/security/advisories/GHSA-2jv6-qqfm-m46mVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-81681(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 12× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-29 21:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-29 21:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-28 19:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-27 20:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 20:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-27 20:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 20:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-27 17:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 16:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 16:43 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-81681?
When was CVE-2026-81681 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-81681 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-81681?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-81681?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-81681
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-81681?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.