A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was found in galaxy_ng, the Ansible Galaxy server plugin for Pulp. An authenticated user with namespace management permissions can set a namespace avatar URL to an arbitrary address, including internal networks, loopback, or cloud instance metadata endpoints. A background worker fetches that URL without checking the destination, which lets the attacker probe internal services and enumerate reachable IP addresses. The HTTP client is also configured without an overall timeout, so a slow or non-responsive target can pin workers and cause a denial of service.
CVE-2026-79717
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 6.4 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-08-25. A secondary CVSS source baseline 6.4; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.
- CVSS v3
- 6.4
- EG Score
- 6.4MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 29EG Risk 29/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity64% × 45%The EG Score, 6.4 of 10.Exploitation0.4% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. - EPSS PROB
- 0.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 29th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
August 25, 2026
Last Modified
August 28, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Aug 25, 2026GitHub - ansible/galaxy_ng: Ansible Galaxy Server - Issues on https://forum.ansible.com Docs on https://galaxy-ng.readthedocs.io/ · GitHub
https://github.com/ansible/galaxy_ng2523431 – (CVE-2026-79717) CVE-2026-79717 galaxy_ng: galaxy_ng: blind SSRF via namespace avatar_url with no private-address restriction
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2523431CVE-2026-79717 - Red Hat Customer Portal
Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 or OpenShift Container Platform 4, is affected by this vulnerability and a fix may be released to a
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-79717Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-79717(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 17× in last 7d / 80× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 98 of 137 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 2 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 39 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-12 14:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-10 12:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 12:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-09 04:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 04:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-08 03:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 03:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-07 02:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-07 02:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-06 02:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 02:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-05 03:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 03:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
Show 73 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-04 04:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 04:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-03 05:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 05:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-02 06:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 06:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-10-01 05:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 05:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-09-30 06:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 06:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-09-29 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-28 21:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 21:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-27 21:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 21:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-26 22:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 22:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-25 15:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-09-24 17:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 17:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-23 18:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 18:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-22 19:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 19:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-21 18:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-21 18:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-20 19:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-09-19 20:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 20:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-09-18 21:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 21:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-17 21:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 21:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-09-16 19:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 19:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-15 18:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-15 18:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-09-14 18:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-09-13 20:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 20:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-09-12 21:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 21:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-09-11 22:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 22:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-09-10 23:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-10 23:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-09-10 00:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-09-09 01:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-09 01:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-09-07 10:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 10:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-09-06 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-09-06 11:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 11:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86r5-w5c4-h244 · GitHub CVSS 6.4
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-79717?
When was CVE-2026-79717 made public?
Is CVE-2026-79717 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-79717?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-79717?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-79717
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-79717?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.