Hi.Events validates a webhook destination only when it is registered, never when it is used. NoInternalUrlRule in backend/app/Validators/Rules/NoInternalUrlRule.php resolves the hostname with gethostbyname() and rejects private and reserved ranges, which any public hostname passes. At dispatch, WebhookDispatchService takes the stored URL and calls it through spatie/laravel-webhook-server without repeating the check, and backend/config/webhook-server.php sets no Guzzle options, so redirect following remains enabled by default. A destination that answers with a redirect to a loopback, private or cloud metadata address therefore causes the server to issue that request, and changing the hostname's DNS record after registration reaches the same result because no resolution is repeated. The response is not discarded: WebhookResponseHandlerService stores the body on the webhook log and WebhookLogResource returns it from the webhook logs endpoint, so the requester reads what the internal service replied rather than inferring it. Both event and organizer webhooks share the rule and the dispatch path. Version 1.11.1-beta revalidates at dispatch, pins the validated address, checks every redirect hop, and decodes IPv6 transition addresses that previously bypassed the filter.
CVE-2026-76838
Score 8.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-24. the CNA's CVSS baseline 8.5; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 8.5
- EG Score
- 8.5(high)
- EG Risk
- 38(Track)EG Risk 38/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity85% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 23%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
August 24, 2026
Last Modified
August 29, 2026
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated Aug 24, 2026Hi.Events before 1.11.1-beta Server-Side Request Forgery via Unvalidated Webhook Redirects | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/hi-events-before-beta-server-side-request-forgery-via-unvalidated-webhook-redirectsHi.Events/backend/app/Validators/Rules/NoInternalUrlRule.php at v.1.11.0-beta · HiEventsDev/Hi.Events · GitHub
https://github.com/HiEventsDev/Hi.Events/blob/v.1.11.0-beta/backend/app/Validators/Rules/NoInternalUrlRule.phpcommit cfbf468bb5b1 (HiEventsDev/Hi.Events)
Patch available: HiEventsDev/Hi.Events v1.11.1-beta (contains commit cfbf468bb5b1)
https://github.com/HiEventsDev/Hi.Events/commit/cfbf468bb5b1Fix reported security advisories
Patch available: HiEventsDev/Hi.Events v1.11.1-beta (PR #1311 merged 2026-08-11)
https://github.com/HiEventsDev/Hi.Events/pull/1311GitHub - HiEventsDev/Hi.Events: Open-source event management and ticket selling platform — perfect for concerts, conferences, and everything in between 🎟️ If you find this project helpful, please consider giving us a star ⭐️ · GitHub
https://github.com/HiEventsDev/Hi.EventsVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-76838(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 27× in last 7d / 27× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-29 23:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-29 12:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-29 12:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-29 05:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-29 05:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-28 17:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-28 05:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-27 17:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 17:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-27 17:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 17:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-27 05:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-26 17:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 17:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-26 05:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-25 17:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 17:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-25 05:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 05:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-24 18:21 UTCEG score recompute
Show 2 moreShow fewer
- 2026-08-24 17:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 17:51 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-76838?
When was CVE-2026-76838 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-76838 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-76838?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-76838?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-76838
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-76838?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.