CVE-2026-74714

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-22. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf: tcp: Fix use-after-free in bpf_iter_tcp_established_batch()

reqsk_queue_hash_req() publishes a TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV request_sock onto the ehash chain, drops the bucket lock, and only afterwards sets rsk_refcnt to 3.

Lockless readers such as __inet_lookup_established() handle this with refcount_inc_not_zero(), but bpf_iter_tcp_established_batch() uses plain sock_hold() while holding the bucket lock, on the assumption that the lock guarantees sk_refcnt > 0. That assumption does not hold for request_sock:

CPU 0 CPU 1 ----- ----- tcp_conn_request() reqsk_queue_hash_req() inet_ehash_insert(req) spin_lock(bucket) __sk_nulls_add_node_rcu(req) // rsk_refcnt == 0 spin_unlock(bucket) bpf_iter_tcp_established_batch() spin_lock(bucket) sock_hold(req) <-- addition on 0 spin_unlock(bucket) refcount_set(&req->rsk_refcnt, 3) // clobbers saturated value

which surfaces as:

refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free. WARNING: lib/refcount.c:25 at refcount_warn_saturate+0x48/0x90, CPU#1 Call Trace: bpf_iter_tcp_established_batch+0x14e/0x170 bpf_iter_tcp_batch+0x53/0x200 bpf_iter_tcp_seq_next+0x27/0x70 bpf_seq_read+0x107/0x410 vfs_read+0xb9/0x380

The iterator's stolen reference is lost when the publishing CPU's refcount_set() overwrites the count, leaving the socket one reference short. When the last legitimate owner drops its reference the reqsk is freed while still reachable, leading to use-after-free.

This reproduces in seconds with tcp_syncookies=0, a handful of threads doing connect()/close() to a local listener while others read an iter/tcp link in a tight loop.

Use refcount_inc_not_zero() and skip the socket on failure. A skipped socket is still part of the bucket, so keep counting it in expected. The reallocations are sized from expected, and a request sock whose refcount gets published while the lock is held across the last realloc must already have room.

A skipped socket is counted in expected but never batched, so end_sk can be short of expected on a batch that is actually complete. Decide completeness by whether the walk left any socket behind instead. The WARN after the locked realloc checks the same, replacing an end_sk == expected check that could not hold on that path since commit cdec67a489d4 ("bpf: tcp: Make sure iter->batch always contains a full bucket snapshot").

If every matching socket in a bucket is mid-init (refcount 0), end_sk stays 0. Advance to the next bucket rather than returning a batch entry that was never filled this round.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(high)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 22, 2026

Last Modified

August 25, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Aug 25, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

bpf: tcp: Fix use-after-free in bpf_iter_tcp_established_batch() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e5fd3f514e27db1f05fbd72ba615d74941e23c51
generic

bpf: tcp: Fix use-after-free in bpf_iter_tcp_established_batch() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/97e74d3e45d653c07c2d406fc530a9bbe3df8396
generic

bpf: tcp: Fix use-after-free in bpf_iter_tcp_established_batch() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cefcbbe20846a45f9a7dae868f7ef1000953e2df
generic

bpf: tcp: Fix use-after-free in bpf_iter_tcp_established_batch() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7d2b60a4bc0499f62ff8520af6309bbe170882fd
generic

bpf: tcp: Fix use-after-free in bpf_iter_tcp_established_batch() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ddbe966b5d1fe212ada749bc3d0b410f1a7dea74
generic

bpf: tcp: Fix use-after-free in bpf_iter_tcp_established_batch() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cc0295f89296ed351fc4b0b48fee887ba02c5d24

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-74714(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 25× in last 7d / 28× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-29 22:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-29 11:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-29 00:39 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-29 00:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-28 11:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-28 00:07 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-28 00:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-27 13:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-27 02:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-26 15:20 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-26 15:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-26 04:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-25 17:27 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-25 17:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-25 06:29 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-25 06:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-25 05:55 UTCEG score recompute 7.80
  23. 2026-08-25 05:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-25 05:55 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.8 · severity → HIGH
  25. 2026-08-24 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 3 more
  1. 2026-08-22 16:24 UTCNVD update
  2. 2026-08-22 15:38 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-22 15:35 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-74714?
CVE-2026-74714 is a high vulnerability published on August 22, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: tcp: Fix use-after-free in bpfitertcpestablishedbatch() reqskqueuehashreq() publishes a TCPNEWSYNRECV request_sock onto the ehash chain, drops the bucket lock, and only afterwards sets rsk_refcnt to 3. Lockless readers such as…
When was CVE-2026-74714 disclosed?
CVE-2026-74714 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 22, 2026, with the most recent update on August 25, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-74714 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-74714 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 97.5% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-74714?
CVE-2026-74714 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-74714?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-74714, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-74714

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-74714?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.