In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ceph: avoid fs reclaim while using current->journal_info
handle_reply() stores a ceph_mds_request pointer in
current->journal_info while filling the inode and dentry cache from
an MDS reply.
An allocation in this section can enter direct reclaim and prune
dentries from another filesystem. If this dirties an ext4 inode, ext4
starts a JBD2 transaction. JBD2 interprets the Ceph request in
current->journal_info as a journal handle and dereferences the
request's r_tid as h_transaction, causing a kernel crash, e.g.:
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00000000077b4818
[...]
Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 6 UID: 0 PID: 2699135 Comm: kworker/6:3 Tainted: G W 6.18.38-i3 #1113 NONE
[...]
Workqueue: ceph-msgr ceph_con_workfn
pstate: 80400009 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
pc : jbd2__journal_start+0x2c/0x208
lr : __ext4_journal_start_sb+0x100/0x178
[...]
Call trace:
jbd2__journal_start+0x2c/0x208 (P)
__ext4_journal_start_sb+0x100/0x178
ext4_dirty_inode+0x3c/0x90
__mark_inode_dirty+0x58/0x400
iput.part.0+0x2b0/0x370
iput+0x18/0x30
dentry_unlink_inode+0xc0/0x158
__dentry_kill+0x80/0x250
shrink_dentry_list+0x90/0x130
prune_dcache_sb+0x60/0x98
super_cache_scan+0xe8/0x190
do_shrink_slab+0x174/0x388
shrink_slab+0xd8/0x4c0
shrink_node+0x31c/0x908
do_try_to_free_pages+0xd0/0x508
try_to_free_pages+0x11c/0x238
__alloc_frozen_pages_noprof+0x4d0/0xdd0
__folio_alloc_noprof+0x18/0x70
__filemap_get_folio+0x248/0x440
ceph_readdir_prepopulate+0x570/0x9e8
mds_dispatch+0x1424/0x1ba0
ceph_con_process_message+0x74/0xa0
ceph_con_v1_try_read+0x3a0/0x1510
ceph_con_workfn+0x260/0x460
Enter a scoped NOFS allocation context and leave it after clearing
journal_info. This prevents filesystem reclaim from recursing into
another filesystem while the field contains Ceph-private data.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it