CVE-2026-74713

HIGHPre-NVD 7.17.1
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-22. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.1Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

vhost_iotlb: bound map allocation in add_range

vhost_iotlb_add_range_ctx() only retires an old entry when the table has a non-zero limit, has exactly reached that limit and has VHOST_IOTLB_FLAG_RETIRE set. Non-retiring tables can keep allocating entries after reaching their configured limit.

Existing vhost devices allocate their IOTLB with max_iotlb_entries from vhost.c, which defaults to 2048 and is tunable by module parameter. Use the caller-provided limit at the allocation point instead of adding a separate default in the common IOTLB helper, and reject non-positive values in vhost paths that can report an error.

Other vhost IOTLB users should not create zero-limit tables when entries can be populated from userspace or guest-controlled requests. Add caller-side max_iotlb_entries parameters for mlx5 vDPA, VDUSE and vhost-vDPA. Reject non-positive VDUSE and vhost-vDPA values, and require at least two entries for vdpa_sim and mlx5 vDPA paths that install full-range mappings, since those mappings are split into two IOTLB entries.

Handle full-range mappings in the common helper by checking that the IOTLB can hold both split entries before inserting the first half. This avoids returning an error after leaving a half mapping behind.

When the table is full, keep the existing retire behavior for retiring tables and return -ENOSPC for non-retiring tables. Reuse the retired map node instead of freeing it and allocating a replacement, so a stream of IOTLB updates cannot keep forcing GFP_ATOMIC allocations after the table has reached its limit. If a zero-limit IOTLB still reaches the common helper, treat it as a configuration error and return -EINVAL.

I found this bug myself, though the patch was written with AI assistance.

CVSS v3
7.1
EG Score
7.1(high)
EG Risk
36(Track)
EG Risk 36/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity71% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 22, 2026

Last Modified

August 25, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 25, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

vhost_iotlb: bound map allocation in add_range - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1ed35ac7f3fe2b4396bdd29ac3a7f0ebc0829e94
generic

vhost_iotlb: bound map allocation in add_range - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ae128dd19040ee06a4f8143c7ced4d18080d7a9a

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-74713(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 25× in last 7d / 28× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-29 22:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-29 11:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-29 00:39 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-29 00:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-28 10:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-27 23:36 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-27 23:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-27 12:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-27 01:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-26 15:07 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-26 15:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-26 04:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-25 17:18 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-25 17:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-25 06:29 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-25 06:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-25 05:55 UTCEG score recompute 7.10
  23. 2026-08-25 05:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-25 05:55 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.1 · severity → HIGH
  25. 2026-08-24 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 3 more
  1. 2026-08-22 16:24 UTCNVD update
  2. 2026-08-22 15:38 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-22 15:35 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-74713?
CVE-2026-74713 is a high vulnerability published on August 22, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vhostiotlb: bound map allocation in addrange vhostiotlbaddrangectx() only retires an old entry when the table has a non-zero limit, has exactly reached that limit and has VHOSTIOTLBFLAG_RETIRE set. Non-retiring tables can keep…
When was CVE-2026-74713 disclosed?
CVE-2026-74713 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 22, 2026, with the most recent update on August 25, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-74713 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-74713 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 97.9% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-74713?
CVE-2026-74713 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.1 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-74713?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-74713, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-74713

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-74713?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.