CVE-2026-74671

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scoredTrending — 3 sources updated this week
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS v2: Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ima: fix out-of-bounds read in xattr_verify()

The digest-length check in xattr_verify() mixes int and size_t:

if (xattr_len - sizeof(xattr_value->type) - hash_start >= iint->ima_hash->length)

sizeof() yields size_t, so the usual arithmetic conversions promote the whole left-hand side to unsigned 64-bit before the subtraction runs. For a truncated xattr this underflows instead of going negative: a 1-byte IMA_XATTR_DIGEST_NG xattr (xattr_len == 1, hash_start == 1) turns "1 - 1 - 1" into SIZE_MAX, which is trivially >= ima_hash->length. The check then passes and the following memcmp() reads iint->ima_hash->length bytes starting past the end of the buffer vfs_getxattr_alloc() allocated for it.

Nothing upstream clamps xattr_len back into a safe range first: ima_get_hash_algo() only special-cases xattr_len < 2 to pick a default algorithm, and evm_verifyxattr() returns INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN rather than failing when no HMAC key is loaded, so a truncated security.ima value reaches the length check as-is.

Rewrite the comparison so every operand stays a signed int and no implicit conversion to size_t can occur.

CVSS v3
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
EG Risk
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
7%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 22, 2026

Last Modified

August 22, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-74671(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 12× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-28 07:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-25 11:46 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-25 11:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-24 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-22 16:24 UTCNVD update
  11. 2026-08-22 15:40 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-22 15:35 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-74671?
CVE-2026-74671 is a publicly disclosed vulnerability published on August 22, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ima: fix out-of-bounds read in xattr_verify() The digest-length check in xattrverify() mixes int and sizet: if (xattrlen - sizeof(xattrvalue->type) - hash_start >= iint->ima_hash->length) sizeof() yields size_t, so the usual…
When was CVE-2026-74671 disclosed?
CVE-2026-74671 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 22, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-74671 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-74671 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 92.7% of all scored CVEs.
How do I remediate CVE-2026-74671?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-74671, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-74671

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-74671?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.