CVE-2026-74635

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-22. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

fbdev: bitblit: bound-check glyph index in bit_cursor()

bit_cursor() fetches the glyph under the cursor with

c = scr_readw(vc_pos); src = vc_font.data + ((c & charmask) * w * height);

where charmask is 0x1ff when vc_hi_font_mask is set. The screen buffer value comes directly from scr_readw() and may be larger than the current font's glyph count.

Syzkaller triggers this via vcs_write(). The Call Trace shows vcs_write() in vc_screen.c writing an arbitrary 16-bit value with writev() to /dev/vcsa, which vcs_write_buf() in vc_screen.c stores via vcs_scr_writew() without checking charcount. The stored value is later read in bit_cursor() in bitblit.c.

When the font is changed from a font with 512 glyphs to a font with 256 glyphs, the screen buffer can retain characters with the high bit set from the previous mode, which could also produce the same out-of-bounds access.

BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in soft_cursor+0x378/0x6bc drivers/video/fbdev/core/softcursor.c:70 Read of size 16 at addr ffff800086c57970

Call Trace: soft_cursor+0x378/0x6bc drivers/video/fbdev/core/softcursor.c:70 bit_cursor+0xa90/0x1108 drivers/video/fbdev/core/bitblit.c:365 fbcon_cursor+0x344/0x498 drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbcon.c:1427 hide_cursor+0xdc/0x2d0 drivers/tty/vt/vt.c:883 update_region+0x100/0x18c drivers/tty/vt/vt.c:669 vcs_write+0x8ec/0xaf0 drivers/tty/vt/vc_screen.c:685

bit_putcs_aligned() and bit_putcs_unaligned() already clamp the glyph index to vc_font.charcount. Apply the same clamp in bit_cursor() after extracting the attribute and masking, before indexing fontdata.

The fix completes the bounds checking started in commit 18c4ef4e765a ("fbdev: bitblit: bound-check glyph index in bit_putcs*"), which missed the cursor path.

This change should be safe because the clamp reuses the existing contract from fbcon: charcount is maintained under console_lock in con_font_set() and fbcon_font_set(), and hi_font_mask is cleared when switching from 512 to 256 glyphs. When stale screen data with high bits remains after a font switch, or when vcs_write() stores an arbitrary value, clamping the index to 0 prevents the out-of-bounds read without changing cursor semantics — the same fallback bit_putcs uses.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(high)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 22, 2026

Last Modified

August 25, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Aug 25, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

fbdev: bitblit: bound-check glyph index in bit_cursor() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e033cbf3975a8465f879ebd5989dc35b04423a4d
generic

fbdev: bitblit: bound-check glyph index in bit_cursor() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9ea879862e66e354e616028c31b39aa3eb6d35d8
generic

fbdev: bitblit: bound-check glyph index in bit_cursor() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bc9db0d879c655d5dfd8add32fd60f13e65d132c
generic

fbdev: bitblit: bound-check glyph index in bit_cursor() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c1e7351767dd30fc574395c82121e4c67b882da3
generic

fbdev: bitblit: bound-check glyph index in bit_cursor() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/94134d70abf9273b70499d97d0adc9185ef21091
generic

fbdev: bitblit: bound-check glyph index in bit_cursor() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bf750cfeacf4e47ac72dadc7f05839696efb8576
generic

fbdev: bitblit: bound-check glyph index in bit_cursor() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/46336f476484f36145e5117e72d7b590f47433ee
generic

fbdev: bitblit: bound-check glyph index in bit_cursor() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/250159ace2dc53c1bdad267aa8da51b638748700

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-74635(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 25× in last 7d / 28× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-30 03:46 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-30 03:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-29 14:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-29 01:44 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-29 01:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-28 12:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-27 23:37 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-08-27 23:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-27 10:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-26 21:33 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-26 21:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-26 08:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-25 19:30 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-25 19:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-25 06:29 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-25 06:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-25 05:56 UTCEG score recompute 7.80
  23. 2026-08-25 05:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-25 05:55 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.8 · severity → HIGH
  25. 2026-08-24 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 3 more
  1. 2026-08-22 16:24 UTCNVD update
  2. 2026-08-22 15:42 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-22 15:35 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-74635?
CVE-2026-74635 is a high vulnerability published on August 22, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fbdev: bitblit: bound-check glyph index in bit_cursor() bit_cursor() fetches the glyph under the cursor with c = scrreadw(vcpos); src = vc_font.data + ((c & charmask) w height); where charmask is 0x1ff when vchifont_mask is set.…
When was CVE-2026-74635 disclosed?
CVE-2026-74635 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 22, 2026, with the most recent update on August 25, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-74635 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-74635 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 97.1% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-74635?
CVE-2026-74635 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-74635?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-74635, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-74635

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-74635?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.