CVE-2026-74691

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-22. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: thunderbolt: Tear down DMA paths before stopping the rings

tbnet_tear_down() stops both rings and frees their frame buffers before calling tb_xdomain_disable_paths(). tb_ring_stop() zeroes the ring's descriptor base and tbnet_free_buffers() unmaps and frees the pages the frames sit in, so by the time __tb_path_deactivate_hop() polls the hop's 'pending' bit, anything still in flight has nowhere to drain to.

The teardown sequence has been in this order since the driver was added. The setup path has not: commit ff7cd07f3064 ("net: thunderbolt: Enable DMA paths only after rings are enabled") moved the path enable to the end of tbnet_connected_work() and documented why:

/* Both logins successful so enable the rings, high-speed DMA * paths and start the network device queue. * * Note we enable the DMA paths last to make sure we have primed * the Rx ring before any incoming packets are allowed to * arrive. */

Teardown was never updated to match, so the rings and the paths now come down in the same order they go up instead of in reverse.

On an ASMedia ASM4242 host router the 'pending' bit then never clears: every teardown burns the full 500 ms timeout and __tb_path_deactivate_hop() returns -ETIMEDOUT. Raising the timeout to 5 s does not help, so the hop is not slow to drain, it never drains at all.

The failure is invisible above the thunderbolt core. __tb_path_deactivate_hops() is void and only calls tb_port_warn(); tb_path_deactivate(), tb_tunnel_deactivate() and __tb_disconnect_xdomain_paths() are void as well, and tb_disconnect_xdomain_paths() ends in an unconditional "return 0". So tb_xdomain_disable_paths() reports success and the netdev_warn() below it never fires. Repeated teardowns eventually take the XDomain control channel down, after which the peer node is gone and only a power cycle brings the controller back.

Deactivating the paths first fixes it. Measured with kretprobes on a stock v6.17 tree with no other patches applied, on a link that was up and had just carried traffic:

before: __tb_path_deactivate_hop() returns 0 for the first hop, then -ETIMEDOUT for the second 500335 us later after: 0 for both, 525 us apart

Alternating the two orderings ABBA over three load levels, four teardowns per arm: every teardown failed before the change (21 of 21 that ran), none failed after (0 of 24). The before arms ran short because the link died partway through. The same split shows up when the interface is enslaved to a bond instead of just brought down, which is how I ran into this in the first place. Throughput and latency after the change are unchanged.

Hosts whose routers drain the hop despite the stale descriptor base see no functional difference, since the paths end up deactivated either way.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
40
EG Risk 40/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity88% × 45%
The EG Score, 8.8 of 10.
Exploitation0.4% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
16th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 22, 2026

Last Modified

August 25, 2026

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Aug 25, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

net: thunderbolt: Tear down DMA paths before stopping the rings - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/68bf02b6b4ad3f748c6db71fd77b6c0402d252f4
Web page

net: thunderbolt: Tear down DMA paths before stopping the rings - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9a482b2b117e5fa656b6d24fc01799e8ac2d4368
Web page

net: thunderbolt: Tear down DMA paths before stopping the rings - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4dd71cb0d23d40cb58fe4261c7bd183dca66caa0
Web page

net: thunderbolt: Tear down DMA paths before stopping the rings - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/103a9b663ac1cacb8465aeff18f84a247154a562
Web page

net: thunderbolt: Tear down DMA paths before stopping the rings - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b5a21615f627c48dafaa6ef82a34a5b97a4352aa
Web page

net: thunderbolt: Tear down DMA paths before stopping the rings - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0da9a6d27155ad072dd76db8cd637feead99a0e0
Web page

net: thunderbolt: Tear down DMA paths before stopping the rings - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7cce39109206bc5497e0953806563644b88bfc44

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-74691(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(6)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (56 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.187-1: fixed in 6.1.187-1
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.107-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (33 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.105-1: fixed in 6.12.105-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (167 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.9-1: fixed in 7.1.9-1
—

All Vendor Advisories

(6)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 109× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 198 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 98 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  2. 2026-10-13 07:30 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-13 07:30 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-13 07:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  5. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  6. 2026-10-12 15:39 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 19:25 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 16:41 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-11 14:00 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  11. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  12. 2026-10-10 14:31 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-10 14:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  14. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  15. 2026-10-09 05:19 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-09 05:19 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-09 05:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  18. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  19. 2026-10-08 04:37 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-08 04:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  21. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  22. 2026-10-07 05:55 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-07 05:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  24. 2026-10-06 18:50 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-06 18:50 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-06 18:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  2. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  3. 2026-10-06 07:47 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-06 07:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  5. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  6. 2026-10-05 17:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  7. 2026-10-05 04:48 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-05 04:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  9. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  10. 2026-10-04 16:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  11. 2026-10-04 05:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  12. 2026-10-03 17:30 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-03 17:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  14. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  15. 2026-10-03 06:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  16. 2026-10-02 19:22 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-02 19:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  18. 2026-10-02 08:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  19. 2026-10-01 21:11 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-01 21:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  21. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  22. 2026-10-01 07:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  23. 2026-09-30 20:21 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-30 20:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  25. 2026-09-30 07:26 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-09-30 07:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  27. 2026-09-29 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  28. 2026-09-29 08:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  29. 2026-09-28 21:34 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-09-28 21:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  31. 2026-09-28 10:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  32. 2026-09-27 23:05 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-09-27 23:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  34. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  35. 2026-09-27 12:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  36. 2026-09-27 00:58 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-09-27 00:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  38. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  39. 2026-09-26 00:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  40. 2026-09-25 16:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  41. 2026-09-25 03:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  42. 2026-09-24 16:20 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-09-24 16:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  44. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  45. 2026-09-24 05:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  46. 2026-09-23 18:12 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-09-23 18:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  48. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  49. 2026-09-23 06:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  50. 2026-09-22 19:40 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-22 19:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  52. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  53. 2026-09-22 05:52 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-09-22 05:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  55. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  56. 2026-09-21 18:48 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-09-21 18:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  58. 2026-09-21 07:42 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-09-21 07:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  60. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  61. 2026-09-20 19:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  62. 2026-09-20 08:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  63. 2026-09-19 20:00 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-09-19 20:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  65. 2026-09-19 08:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  66. 2026-09-18 21:36 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-09-18 21:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  68. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  69. 2026-09-18 09:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  70. 2026-09-17 21:59 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-09-17 21:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  72. 2026-09-17 10:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  73. 2026-09-16 23:51 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-09-16 23:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m57c-v73h-37p6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  75. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-74691?
CVE-2026-74691 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 22, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: thunderbolt: Tear down DMA paths before stopping the rings tbnetteardown() stops both rings and frees their frame buffers before calling tbxdomaindisablepaths(). tbring_stop() zeroes the ring's descriptor base and…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-74691 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-74691 was published on August 22, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 25, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-74691 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-74691 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (16th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-74691?
CVE-2026-74691 has a CVSS base score of 8.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-74691?
A fix for CVE-2026-74691 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-74691 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-74691

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-74691?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.