CVE-2026-74454

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-15. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drm/vc4: Supply the overflow slot size in BPOS, not the whole bin BO size

vc4_overflow_mem_work() points BPOA at a 512KB slot inside the 16MB binner BO, but writes the size of the whole BO to BPOS. On every binner out-of-memory event the PTB is therefore authorized to write tile lists across all the other slots (which may hold the tile state, tile alloc and overflow memory of in-flight jobs) and, for any slot but the first, past the end of the binner BO into unrelated CMA memory.

Since CMA pages are recycled into page cache and user allocations, this is arbitrary memory corruption by GPU DMA. In practice it shows up as GPU hangs with corrupted control list pointers, userspace heap corruption, a GPU that stays permanently wedged after the first hang, and occasional full system crashes, whenever a job overflows the initial binner slot.

The bug dates back to the conversion from a dedicated overflow BO (where writing the full BO size was correct) to the slotted binner BO.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
35
EG Risk 35/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity78% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
2nd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 15, 2026

Last Modified

August 19, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Aug 17, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

drm/vc4: Supply the overflow slot size in BPOS, not the whole bin BO size - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6cd5acf6f87c073622bd61e38fe99c47365cda9c
Web page

drm/vc4: Supply the overflow slot size in BPOS, not the whole bin BO size - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6395789e4739aa5177bbec0fa0f07ccc38d249b0
Web page

drm/vc4: Supply the overflow slot size in BPOS, not the whole bin BO size - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2f2291a119e9a8b696ae8bb36e86b75d272ceaea
Web page

drm/vc4: Supply the overflow slot size in BPOS, not the whole bin BO size - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1e33ca7f44be64beed2735bb76b86eb65ba8c05b
Web page

drm/vc4: Supply the overflow slot size in BPOS, not the whole bin BO size - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0badb30871004d34df87be33e853536f0b69885f

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-74454(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-tegra-rt-6.8 (6.8.0-1036.39) @ noble2026-10-13ubuntu

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (56 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.187-1: fixed in 6.1.187-1
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.107-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (33 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.105-1: fixed in 6.12.105-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (165 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.8-1: fixed in 7.1.8-1
—

Additional Vendor Advisories

(1)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 96× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 254 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 154 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  2. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  3. 2026-10-18 03:14 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  5. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  6. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  7. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  8. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  9. 2026-10-13 07:35 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-13 07:35 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-13 07:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c238-677w-2p87 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  12. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  13. 2026-10-12 15:39 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-11 19:25 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-11 16:41 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-11 14:00 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  18. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  19. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  20. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  21. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  22. 2026-10-06 22:21 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-06 22:21 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-06 22:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c238-677w-2p87 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  25. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-06 09:09 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-06 09:09 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-06 09:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c238-677w-2p87 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  4. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  5. 2026-10-05 12:09 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-05 12:09 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-05 12:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c238-677w-2p87 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  8. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  9. 2026-10-04 21:56 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-04 21:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c238-677w-2p87 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  11. 2026-10-04 07:22 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-04 07:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c238-677w-2p87 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  13. 2026-10-03 19:29 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-03 19:29 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-03 19:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c238-677w-2p87 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  16. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  17. 2026-10-02 15:51 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-02 15:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c238-677w-2p87 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  19. 2026-10-02 02:00 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-02 02:00 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-02 02:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c238-677w-2p87 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  22. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  23. 2026-10-01 08:50 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-01 08:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c238-677w-2p87 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  25. 2026-09-30 20:57 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-09-30 20:57 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-09-30 20:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c238-677w-2p87 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  28. 2026-09-29 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  29. 2026-09-28 23:38 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-09-28 23:38 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-09-28 23:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c238-677w-2p87 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  32. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  33. 2026-09-28 10:47 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-09-28 10:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c238-677w-2p87 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  35. 2026-09-27 22:38 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-27 22:38 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-09-27 22:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c238-677w-2p87 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  38. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  39. 2026-09-27 08:25 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-09-27 08:25 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-09-27 08:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c238-677w-2p87 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  42. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  43. 2026-09-26 00:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  44. 2026-09-25 02:28 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-09-25 02:28 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-09-25 02:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c238-677w-2p87 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  47. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  48. 2026-09-24 12:04 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-09-24 12:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c238-677w-2p87 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  50. 2026-09-24 00:11 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-09-24 00:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c238-677w-2p87 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  52. 2026-09-23 12:12 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-09-23 12:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c238-677w-2p87 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  54. 2026-09-23 00:19 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-09-23 00:19 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-09-23 00:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c238-677w-2p87 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  57. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  58. 2026-09-22 12:26 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-09-22 12:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c238-677w-2p87 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  60. 2026-09-22 00:32 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-09-22 00:32 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-09-22 00:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c238-677w-2p87 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  63. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  64. 2026-09-21 12:39 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-09-21 12:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c238-677w-2p87 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  66. 2026-09-21 00:35 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-09-21 00:35 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-09-21 00:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c238-677w-2p87 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  69. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  70. 2026-09-20 12:41 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-09-20 12:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c238-677w-2p87 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  72. 2026-09-20 00:25 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-09-20 00:25 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-09-20 00:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c238-677w-2p87 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  75. 2026-09-19 12:31 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-74454?
CVE-2026-74454 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 15, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/vc4: Supply the overflow slot size in BPOS, not the whole bin BO size vc4overflowmem_work() points BPOA at a 512KB slot inside the 16MB binner BO, but writes the size of the whole BO to BPOS. On every binner out-of-memory event…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-74454 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-74454 was published on August 15, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 19, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-74454 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-74454 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (2nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-74454?
CVE-2026-74454 has a CVSS base score of 7.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-74454?
A fix for CVE-2026-74454 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-74454 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-74454

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-74454?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.