CVE-2026-72854

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.35.3
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

This medium-severity CVE scores 5.3 under the CNA's CVSS (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit-prediction score not yet available (the EPSS model rescores nightly; freshly-published CVEs typically appear within 48 hours). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: cna:vulncheck
5.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: CVSS: 5.3Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

msgpack_unpacker_expand_buffer in src/unpack.c, reached through the public msgpack_unpacker_reserve_buffer API, computes its new buffer size using an unchecked size_t addition of the requested size and the amount already used. The doubling loop guards its own multiplication against overflow, but the addition in the loop condition is unguarded, so a request near SIZE_MAX wraps: the loop condition is already satisfied, the allocation is performed at the small pre-wrap size, and the function returns true. The caller is told the requested capacity was reserved when it was not, so a subsequent write of the requested length overflows the heap buffer. The library's own example/lib_buffer_unpack.c demonstrates the reserve-then-write pattern, and its defensive assert comparing capacity against the request is compiled out under NDEBUG. msgpack-c's own decode entry points do not derive the reservation size from untrusted input, so reaching this requires an integration that passes an attacker-influenced length to the reservation API, such as a length-prefixed streaming transport.

CVSS v3
5.3
EG Score
5.3(low)
EG Risk
28(Track)
EG Risk 28/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity53% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
EPSS %ILE
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 20, 2026

Last Modified

August 20, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Aug 20, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

msgpack-c Integer Overflow in msgpack_unpacker_expand_buffer Causes a False-Success Undersized Reservation | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/msgpack-c-integer-overflow-in-msgpack-unpacker-expand-buffer-causes-a-false-success-undersized-reservation
generic

GitHub - msgpack/msgpack-c: MessagePack implementation for C and C++ / msgpack.org[C/C++] · GitHub

https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-c
generic

msgpack-c/example/lib_buffer_unpack.c at c-7.0.1 · msgpack/msgpack-c · GitHub

https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-c/blob/c-7.0.1/example/lib_buffer_unpack.c
generic

msgpack-c/include/msgpack/unpack.h at c-7.0.1 · msgpack/msgpack-c · GitHub

https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-c/blob/c-7.0.1/include/msgpack/unpack.h#L219-L223
generic

msgpack-c/src/unpack.c at c-7.0.1 · msgpack/msgpack-c · GitHub

https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-c/blob/c-7.0.1/src/unpack.c#L429-L502
generic

Integer overflow in msgpack_unpacker_expand_buffer() causes false-success undersized reservation · Issue #1181 · msgpack/msgpack-c · GitHub

https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-c/issues/1181

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 2× in last 7d / 2× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-20 18:32 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-20 18:31 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-72854?
CVE-2026-72854 is a medium vulnerability published on August 20, 2026. msgpackunpackerexpandbuffer in src/unpack.c, reached through the public msgpackunpackerreservebuffer API, computes its new buffer size using an unchecked sizet addition of the requested size and the amount already used. The doubling loop guards its own multiplication against overflow, but the…
When was CVE-2026-72854 disclosed?
CVE-2026-72854 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 20, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-72854?
CVE-2026-72854 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 5.3 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending). The EG score is currently aggregating — additional source signals are being incorporated as they become available..
How do I remediate CVE-2026-72854?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-72854, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-72854

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-72854?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.