In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: fix bo->pin leaking in amdgpu_bo_create_reserved
amdgpu_bo_create_reserved() only allocates a new BO when
*bo_ptr (struct amdgpu_bo **bo_ptr as input parameter) is
NULL, it simply skips creation when *bo_ptr is non-NULL.
But it unconditionally reserves, pins, gart allocates
and maps the BO afterwards.
When the same non-NULL BO pointer is passed in again,
for example firmware buffers that live in adev and are
re-loaded on every resume / cp_resume / start
under AMDGPU_FW_LOAD_DIRECT, amdgpu_bo_pin() just increases
pin_count unconditionally, however the matching teardown only unpins
once, so pin_count never drops to zero, so TTM is not able
to move, swap or evict a BO, causing BO leaks.
This commit fixes this issue by only pinning the bo
once at creation, and repeated calls no longer
take additional pin references.
(cherry picked from commit 3ddc0ae76202c447b6aec61e907b852bc94671cf)
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
- EG Severity
- Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the BOD 26-04 block below.
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it