CVE-2026-64235

HIGHPre-NVD 8.18.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 8.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-24. a secondary CVSS source baseline 8.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
8.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 8.1Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

x86/ftrace: Relocate %rip-relative percpu refs in dynamic trampolines

With CONFIG_CALL_DEPTH_TRACKING enabled on an x86 retbleed-affected platform (eg: Skylake), with retbleed=stuff, registering a dynamic ftrace trampoline crashes on the first call into the traced function:

BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffff88817ae18880 #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page PGD 4b53067 P4D 4b53067 PUD 0 Oops: Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP PTI CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 187 Comm: usleep Not tainted 7.0.10 #243 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Arch Linux 1.17.0-2-2 04/01/2014 Code: 24 78 00 00 00 00 48 89 ea 48 89 54 24 20 48 8b b4 24 b8 00 00 00 48 8b bc 24 b0 00 00 00 48 89 bc 24 80 00 00 00 48 83 ef 05 <65> 48 c1 3d 1f a8 b6 02 05 48 8b 15 f6 00 00 00 4c 89 3c 24 4c 89 Call Trace: ? find_held_lock ? exc_page_fault ? lock_release ? __x64_sys_clock_nanosleep ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare ? trace_hardirqs_on __x64_sys_clock_nanosleep do_syscall_64 ? exc_page_fault ? call_depth_return_thunk entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe ... Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception

This small reproducer allows to easily trigger the crash:

# echo 'p __x64_sys_clock_nanosleep' > /sys/kernel/tracing/kprobe_events # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/tracing/events/kprobes/p___x64_sys_clock_nanosleep_0/enable # usleep 1

Monitoring the crash under GDB points to the exact instruction in charge of incrementing the call depth:

sarq $5, %gs:__x86_call_depth(%rip)

This instruction matches the one inserted by the ftrace_regs_caller from ftrace_64.S. This emitted code was likely working fine until the introduction of

59bec00ace28 ("x86/percpu: Introduce %rip-relative addressing to PER_CPU_VAR()"):

it has made the call depth accounting addressing relative to $rip, instead of being based on an absolute address.

As this code exact location depends on where the trampoline lives in memory, the corresponding displacement needs to be adjusted at runtime to actually correctly find the per-cpu __x86_call_depth value, otherwise the targeted address is wrong, leading to the page fault seen above.

Fix the %rip-relative displacement of the copied CALL_DEPTH_ACCOUNT instruction (from ftrace_regs_caller) by calling text_poke_apply_relocation(), as it is done for example by the x86 BPF JIT compiler through x86_call_depth_emit_accounting(). This corrects both CALL_DEPTH_ACCOUNT slots, in ftrace_caller and ftrace_regs_caller.

[ bp: Massage. ]

CVSS v3
8.1
EG Score
8.1(medium)
EG Risk
41(Track)
EG Risk 41/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity81% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
25%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 24, 2026

Last Modified

August 12, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Jul 27, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

x86/ftrace: Relocate %rip-relative percpu refs in dynamic trampolines - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d59cc66b702757e3c5a711e78a38583eac0c2738
generic

x86/ftrace: Relocate %rip-relative percpu refs in dynamic trampolines - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a17dc12bfed8868e6a86f3b45c16065a70641acb
generic

x86/ftrace: Relocate %rip-relative percpu refs in dynamic trampolines - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9edff632ca216169846f8a63a5a3dc467e239c7a
generic

x86/ftrace: Relocate %rip-relative percpu refs in dynamic trampolines - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8093442a2d1d4b42b9340a86023ccb2afb30b93a

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64235(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(3)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)6.12.94-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (138 versions)7.0.12-1

All Vendor Advisories

(3)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 34× in last 7d / 176× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 206 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-30 00:18 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-30 00:18 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-08-30 00:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-27 21:06 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-27 21:06 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-08-27 21:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-27 10:00 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-27 10:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-26 19:52 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-26 19:52 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-08-26 19:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-26 06:52 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-26 06:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-25 19:43 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-25 19:43 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-25 19:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-25 08:43 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-25 08:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-25 08:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-24 21:41 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-24 21:41 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-24 21:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-24 10:23 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-24 10:23 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-08-24 10:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-23 23:23 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-23 23:23 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-08-23 23:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-23 12:23 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-23 12:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-23 01:23 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-23 01:23 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-23 01:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-22 14:24 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-22 14:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-22 03:21 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-22 03:21 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-22 03:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-21 16:19 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-08-21 16:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-21 05:19 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-21 05:19 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-21 05:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-08-20 18:19 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-08-20 18:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-08-20 07:18 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-08-20 07:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-19 20:18 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-08-19 20:18 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-08-19 20:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-08-19 05:54 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-08-19 05:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-08-18 18:53 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-08-18 18:53 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-18 18:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-08-18 07:21 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-08-18 07:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-08-17 20:21 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-08-17 20:21 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-08-17 20:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-08-17 09:18 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-08-17 09:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  48. 2026-08-16 22:19 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-08-16 22:19 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-08-16 22:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-08-16 11:19 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-08-16 11:19 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-08-16 11:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-08-16 00:20 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-08-16 00:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-08-15 13:20 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-08-15 13:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-08-15 02:20 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-08-15 02:20 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-08-15 02:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-08-14 15:20 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-14 15:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-08-14 04:21 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-08-14 04:21 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-14 04:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-08-13 17:21 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-08-13 17:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-08-13 06:19 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-08-13 06:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  73. 2026-08-12 19:19 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-08-12 19:19 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-08-12 19:19 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64235?
CVE-2026-64235 is a high vulnerability published on July 24, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/ftrace: Relocate %rip-relative percpu refs in dynamic trampolines With CONFIGCALLDEPTH_TRACKING enabled on an x86 retbleed-affected platform (eg: Skylake), with retbleed=stuff, registering a dynamic ftrace trampoline crashes on…
When was CVE-2026-64235 disclosed?
CVE-2026-64235 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 24, 2026, with the most recent update on August 12, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-64235 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64235 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 74.8% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64235?
CVE-2026-64235 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.1 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64235?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-64235, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64235

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64235?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.