CVE-2026-64098

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-19. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drm/virtio: use uninterruptible resv lock for plane updates

virtio_gpu_cursor_plane_update() and virtio_gpu_resource_flush() lock the framebuffer BO's dma_resv via virtio_gpu_array_lock_resv() and ignore its return value. The function can fail with -EINTR from dma_resv_lock_interruptible() (signal during lock wait) or with -ENOMEM from dma_resv_reserve_fences() (fence slot allocation), leaving the resv lock not held. The queue path then walks the object array and calls dma_resv_add_fence(), which requires the lock held; with lockdep enabled this trips dma_resv_assert_held():

WARNING: drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c:296 at dma_resv_add_fence+0x71e/0x840 Call Trace: virtio_gpu_array_add_fence virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_sgs virtio_gpu_queue_fenced_ctrl_buffer virtio_gpu_cursor_plane_update drm_atomic_helper_commit_planes drm_atomic_helper_commit_tail commit_tail drm_atomic_helper_commit drm_atomic_commit drm_atomic_helper_update_plane __setplane_atomic drm_mode_cursor_universal drm_mode_cursor_common drm_mode_cursor_ioctl drm_ioctl __x64_sys_ioctl

Beyond the WARN, mutating the dma_resv fence list without the lock races with concurrent readers/writers and can corrupt the list.

Both call sites run inside the .atomic_update plane callback, which DRM atomic helpers do not allow to fail (by the time it runs, the commit has been signed off to userspace and there is no clean rollback path). Moving the lock acquisition to .prepare_fb was rejected because the broader lock scope deadlocks against other BO locking paths in the same atomic commit.

Introduce virtio_gpu_lock_one_resv_uninterruptible() that uses dma_resv_lock() instead of dma_resv_lock_interruptible(). This eliminates the -EINTR failure mode -- the realistic syzbot trigger -- without extending the lock hold across the commit. The helper locks a single BO and rejects nents > 1 with -EINVAL; both fix sites lock exactly one BO.

Use it from virtio_gpu_cursor_plane_update() and virtio_gpu_resource_flush(); check the return value to handle the remaining -ENOMEM case from dma_resv_reserve_fences() by freeing the objs and skipping the plane update for that frame. The framebuffer BOs touched here are not shared with other contexts and lock contention is expected to be brief, so the loss of signal-interruptibility is acceptable.

Other callers of virtio_gpu_array_lock_resv() (the ioctl paths) continue to use the interruptible variant.

The bug was reported by syzbot, triggered via fault injection (fail_nth) on the DRM_IOCTL_MODE_CURSOR path, which forces the -ENOMEM branch in dma_resv_reserve_fences().

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
5%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

August 11, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Jul 21, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

drm/virtio: use uninterruptible resv lock for plane updates - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c86077d512ee980cc91322211d35dbcd3175f64c
generic

drm/virtio: use uninterruptible resv lock for plane updates - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a2359a411b15f495d12cfda6a7db6855ebb7f90f
generic

drm/virtio: use uninterruptible resv lock for plane updates - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9af1b6e175c82daf4b423da339a722d8e67a735a
generic

drm/virtio: use uninterruptible resv lock for plane updates - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8fadd01cf461fee5bb11506621339c548447e5c7
generic

drm/virtio: use uninterruptible resv lock for plane updates - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7930eee22cd3df61e85be8aa512032ab303b7167
generic

drm/virtio: use uninterruptible resv lock for plane updates - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/21ab64c77a30d56efc506c8fa2ad8959f8ce3d36

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64098(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(5)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (496 versions)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (53 versions)6.1.176-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)6.12.94-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (138 versions)7.0.12-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(5)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 34× in last 7d / 158× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 187 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-26 11:41 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-26 11:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-25 22:44 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-25 22:44 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-25 22:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-25 08:37 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-25 08:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-24 19:18 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-24 19:18 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-24 19:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-24 06:27 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-24 06:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-23 17:36 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-23 17:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-23 04:46 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-23 04:46 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-23 04:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-22 15:55 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-22 15:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-22 02:53 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-22 02:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-21 14:00 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-21 14:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-21 01:06 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-21 01:06 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-08-21 01:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-20 12:14 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-08-20 12:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-19 22:58 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-19 22:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-19 08:37 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-19 08:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-18 19:46 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-18 19:46 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-18 19:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-18 02:52 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-18 02:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-17 14:01 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-17 14:01 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-17 14:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-17 01:11 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-17 01:11 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-17 01:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-08-16 12:20 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-08-16 12:20 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-16 12:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-15 23:30 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-08-15 23:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-08-15 10:39 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-08-15 10:39 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-08-15 10:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-08-14 21:48 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-08-14 21:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-08-14 08:58 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-08-14 08:58 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-08-14 08:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-08-13 20:07 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-08-13 20:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-08-13 07:17 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-08-13 07:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-08-12 17:57 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-08-12 17:57 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-08-12 17:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  48. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-08-12 05:06 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-08-12 05:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-08-11 16:16 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-08-11 16:16 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-08-11 16:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-08-11 10:40 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-08-11 10:40 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-08-11 10:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-08-10 21:50 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-08-10 21:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-08-10 08:59 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-08-10 08:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-08-09 20:09 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-08-09 20:09 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-09 20:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-08-09 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-08-09 07:18 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-09 07:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-08-08 18:28 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-08-08 18:28 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-08-08 18:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-08-08 05:37 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-08 05:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-08-07 16:47 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-08-07 16:47 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64098?
CVE-2026-64098 is a high vulnerability published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/virtio: use uninterruptible resv lock for plane updates virtiogpucursorplaneupdate() and virtiogpuresource_flush() lock the framebuffer BO's dmaresv via virtiogpuarraylock_resv() and ignore its return value. The function can…
When was CVE-2026-64098 disclosed?
CVE-2026-64098 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 19, 2026, with the most recent update on August 11, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-64098 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64098 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 95.3% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64098?
CVE-2026-64098 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64098?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-64098, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64098

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64098?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.