CVE-2026-64057

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-19. the CNA's CVSS baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

afs: Fix the locking used by afs_get_link()

The afs filesystem in the kernel doesn't do locking correctly for symbolic links. There are a number of problems:

(1) It doesn't do any locking around afs_read_single() to prevent races between multiple ->get_link() calls, thereby allowing the possibility of leaks.

(2) It doesn't use RCU barriering when accessing the buffer pointers during RCU pathwalk.

(3) It can race with another thread updating the contents of the symlink if a third party updated it on the server.

Fix this by the following means:

(0) Move symlink handling into its own file as this makes it more complicated.

(1) Take the validate_lock around afs_read_single() to prevent races between multiple ->get_link() calls.

(2) Keep a separate copy of the symlink contents with an rcu_head. This is always going to be a lot smaller than a page, so it can be kmalloc'd and save quite a bit of memory. It also needs a refcount for non-RCU pathwalk.

(3) Split the symlink read and write-to-cache routines in afs from those for directories.

(4) Discard the I/O buffer as soon as the write-to-cache completes as this is a full page (plus a folio_queue).

(5) If there's no cache, discard the I/O buffer immediately after reading and copying if there is no cache.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Jul 21, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

afs: Fix the locking used by afs_get_link() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c0410adf3da6db46f3513411fcf95e63c2f1d1ad
generic

afs: Fix the locking used by afs_get_link() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/77ea917cbed62882a33114b1e23ededb977e4287

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64057(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(5)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (138 versions)7.0.12-1

All Vendor Advisories

(5)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 26× in last 7d / 153× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 198 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-30 02:51 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-30 02:51 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-30 02:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-28 04:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-27 15:14 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-27 15:14 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-27 15:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-27 01:37 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-27 01:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-26 12:44 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-08-26 12:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-25 23:44 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-08-25 23:44 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-25 23:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-25 10:49 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-25 10:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-24 21:57 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-24 21:57 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-24 21:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-24 09:05 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-24 09:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-23 20:04 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-23 20:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-23 07:12 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-23 07:12 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-08-23 07:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-22 18:20 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-08-22 18:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-22 05:28 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-22 05:28 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-22 05:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-21 16:36 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-08-21 16:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-21 03:27 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-08-21 03:27 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-21 03:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-20 14:35 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-20 14:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-20 01:05 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-20 01:05 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-20 01:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-19 12:08 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-19 12:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-18 23:11 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-08-18 23:11 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-18 23:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-08-18 10:19 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-08-18 10:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-08-17 21:26 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-08-17 21:26 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-08-17 21:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-08-17 08:34 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-08-17 08:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-08-16 19:43 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-08-16 19:43 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-08-16 19:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-08-16 06:50 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-08-16 06:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-08-15 17:59 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-15 17:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-15 05:07 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-08-15 05:07 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-15 05:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-08-14 16:14 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-08-14 16:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-08-14 03:22 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-08-14 03:22 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-08-14 03:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-08-13 14:30 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-13 14:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-08-13 01:34 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-13 01:34 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-13 01:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-08-12 12:42 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-08-12 12:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-08-11 23:46 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-08-11 23:46 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-08-11 23:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-08-11 10:54 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-08-11 10:54 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-08-11 10:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-08-10 22:02 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-08-10 22:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  73. 2026-08-10 09:09 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-08-10 09:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-08-09 20:17 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64057?
CVE-2026-64057 is a high vulnerability published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: afs: Fix the locking used by afsgetlink() The afs filesystem in the kernel doesn't do locking correctly for symbolic links. There are a number of problems: (1) It doesn't do any locking around afsreadsingle() to prevent races…
When was CVE-2026-64057 disclosed?
CVE-2026-64057 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 19, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-64057 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64057 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 97.9% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64057?
CVE-2026-64057 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 7.8 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64057?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-64057, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64057

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64057?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.