CVE-2026-64094

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-07-19. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

batman-adv: bla: avoid NULL-ptr deref for claim via dropped interface

Without rtnl_lock held, a hardif might be retrieved as primary interface of a meshif, but then (while operating on this interface) getting decoupled from the mesh interface. In this case, the meshif still exists but the pointer from the primary hardif to the meshif is set to NULL.

The mesh_iface must be checked first to be non-NULL before continuing to send an ARP request using meshif.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
The EG Score, 5.5 of 10.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
5th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

August 11, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Aug 11, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

batman-adv: bla: avoid NULL-ptr deref for claim via dropped interface - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f80d3d98d2ff78d9e2fe5d68b1f45948c4f7bd24
Web page

batman-adv: bla: avoid NULL-ptr deref for claim via dropped interface - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/efb62458c94db1fe3a287e7e89c31b0cfb03f938
Web page

batman-adv: bla: avoid NULL-ptr deref for claim via dropped interface - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6921a7683ae9ad0208d829e71f725a9e25ccff49
Web page

batman-adv: bla: avoid NULL-ptr deref for claim via dropped interface - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/555b8d3f5c313d81d46274fd0976352dafc80124
Web page

batman-adv: bla: avoid NULL-ptr deref for claim via dropped interface - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/53cb3511f6eda37d3bd923545fdba6013b6d7bb7
Web page

batman-adv: bla: avoid NULL-ptr deref for claim via dropped interface - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4f6266735a0ba6a568b6d4c9fa51c33a5a7f2d70
Web page

batman-adv: bla: avoid NULL-ptr deref for claim via dropped interface - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2a8c9e86529156c62d9187b9ed9454c31665ad33
Web page

batman-adv: bla: avoid NULL-ptr deref for claim via dropped interface - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0f3ebd7bb417aabc44853cc7c2a184ebb0e05b45

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64094(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(8)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (54 versions)
  • every version up to 5.10.259-1: fixed in 5.10.259-1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (53 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.176-1: fixed in 6.1.176-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.94-1: fixed in 6.12.94-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (142 versions)
  • every version up to 7.0.12-1: fixed in 7.0.12-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(8)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 43× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 180 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 80 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 15:48 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 19:33 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 16:48 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 14:09 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  8. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  9. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  10. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  11. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  12. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  13. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  14. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  15. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  16. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  17. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  18. 2026-10-01 08:14 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-01 08:14 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-01 08:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7pc5-4w4m-mhg6 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  21. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  22. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  23. 2026-09-28 07:17 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-28 07:17 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-09-28 07:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7pc5-4w4m-mhg6 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  2. 2026-09-24 03:36 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-24 03:36 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-09-24 03:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7pc5-4w4m-mhg6 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  5. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  6. 2026-09-23 01:55 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-23 01:55 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-09-23 01:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7pc5-4w4m-mhg6 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  9. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  10. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  11. 2026-09-18 04:14 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-18 04:14 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-09-18 04:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7pc5-4w4m-mhg6 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  14. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  15. 2026-09-16 12:54 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-09-16 12:54 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-09-16 12:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7pc5-4w4m-mhg6 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  18. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  19. 2026-09-13 22:54 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-13 22:54 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-09-13 22:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7pc5-4w4m-mhg6 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  22. 2026-09-12 19:34 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-12 19:34 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-09-12 19:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7pc5-4w4m-mhg6 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  25. 2026-09-11 18:42 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-09-11 18:42 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-09-11 18:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7pc5-4w4m-mhg6 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  28. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  29. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  30. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  31. 2026-09-07 23:14 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-07 23:14 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-09-07 23:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7pc5-4w4m-mhg6 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  34. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  35. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  36. 2026-09-06 12:49 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-09-06 12:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7pc5-4w4m-mhg6 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  38. 2026-09-05 09:52 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-05 09:52 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-09-05 09:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7pc5-4w4m-mhg6 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  41. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  42. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  43. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  44. 2026-08-31 03:35 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-08-31 03:35 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-08-31 03:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7pc5-4w4m-mhg6 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  47. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  48. 2026-08-30 02:47 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-08-30 02:47 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-08-30 02:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7pc5-4w4m-mhg6 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  51. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  52. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  53. 2026-08-27 11:48 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-08-27 11:48 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-08-27 11:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7pc5-4w4m-mhg6 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  56. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  57. 2026-08-26 05:45 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-08-26 05:45 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-08-26 05:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7pc5-4w4m-mhg6 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  60. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  61. 2026-08-25 04:30 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-08-25 04:30 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-08-25 04:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7pc5-4w4m-mhg6 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  64. 2026-08-24 03:43 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-08-24 03:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7pc5-4w4m-mhg6 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  66. 2026-08-23 01:22 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-23 01:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7pc5-4w4m-mhg6 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  68. 2026-08-22 00:34 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-08-22 00:34 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-08-22 00:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7pc5-4w4m-mhg6 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  71. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  72. 2026-08-20 23:46 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-08-20 23:46 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-08-20 23:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7pc5-4w4m-mhg6 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  75. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64094?
CVE-2026-64094 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: batman-adv: bla: avoid NULL-ptr deref for claim via dropped interface Without rtnl_lock held, a hardif might be retrieved as primary interface of a meshif, but then (while operating on this interface) getting decoupled from the…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-64094 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-64094 was published on July 19, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 11, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-64094 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64094 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (5th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64094?
CVE-2026-64094 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64094?
A fix for CVE-2026-64094 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-64094 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64094

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64094?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.