CVE-2026-64045

HIGHPre-NVD 8.48.4
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 8.4 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-19. the CNA's CVSS baseline 8.4; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
8.4EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 8.4Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ovpn: tcp - use cached peer pointer in ovpn_tcp_close()

ovpn_tcp_close() loads the ovpn_socket via rcu_dereference_sk_user_data() under rcu_read_lock(), takes a reference on sock->peer, caches the peer pointer in a local, and drops the read lock. It then passes sock->peer (rather than the cached local) to ovpn_peer_del(), re-dereferencing the ovpn_socket after the RCU read section has ended.

Unlike ovpn_tcp_sendmsg(), which uses the same "load under RCU, use after unlock" pattern but is protected by lock_sock() held across the function, ovpn_tcp_close() runs without the socket lock: inet_release() invokes sk_prot->close() without taking lock_sock first.

ovpn_socket_release() can therefore complete its kref_put -> detach -> synchronize_rcu -> kfree(sock) sequence concurrently, in the window after ovpn_tcp_close() drops rcu_read_lock() but before it dereferences sock->peer. The synchronize_rcu() in ovpn_socket_release() protects readers that use the dereferenced pointer inside the RCU read section, not those that escape the pointer to a local and use it afterwards.

A reproducer follows the pattern of commit 94560267d6c4 ("ovpn: tcp - don't deref NULL sk_socket member after tcp_close()"): trigger a peer removal (keepalive expiration or netlink OVPN_CMD_DEL_PEER) at the same moment userspace closes the TCP fd. That commit fixed the detach-side of the same race window; this one fixes the close-side at a different victim.

Tighten the entry block to read sock->peer exactly once into the cached peer local, and route all subsequent uses (the hold check, the ovpn_peer_del() call, and the prot->close() invocation) through that local. sock->peer is only ever written once in ovpn_socket_new() under lock_sock(), before rcu_assign_sk_user_data() publishes the ovpn_socket, and is never reassigned afterwards - but the previous multi-read pattern made that invariant implicit rather than explicit. The same multi-read shape exists in ovpn_tcp_recvmsg(), ovpn_tcp_sendmsg(), ovpn_tcp_data_ready() and ovpn_tcp_write_space(); those will be cleaned up via a dedicated helper in a follow-up net-next series.

CVSS v3
8.4
EG Score
8.4(medium)
EG Risk
42(Track)
EG Risk 42/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity84% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
5%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Jul 20, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

ovpn: tcp - use cached peer pointer in ovpn_tcp_close() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e5460eb7238c19d651a9b22b2378b587033a4095
generic

ovpn: tcp - use cached peer pointer in ovpn_tcp_close() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d3ef441907fca7c340979e577a3db3bb634bf166
generic

ovpn: tcp - use cached peer pointer in ovpn_tcp_close() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/775d8d7ad02aa345e1588424a6a8b9ae49fb9012

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64045(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(5)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (138 versions)7.0.12-1

All Vendor Advisories

(5)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 25× in last 7d / 160× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 209 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-30 02:51 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-30 02:51 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-30 02:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-27 23:19 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-27 23:19 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-08-27 23:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-27 11:49 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-27 11:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-26 22:18 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-26 22:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-26 07:23 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-26 07:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-25 18:47 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-25 18:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-25 06:45 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-25 06:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-24 19:05 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-24 19:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-24 06:44 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-24 06:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-23 19:14 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-23 19:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-23 07:44 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-23 07:44 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-23 07:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-22 20:14 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-22 20:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-22 08:44 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-22 08:44 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-22 08:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-21 21:14 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-21 21:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-21 09:44 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-21 09:44 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-21 09:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-20 22:14 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-20 22:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-20 10:29 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-20 10:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-19 23:00 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-19 23:00 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-19 23:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-19 07:18 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-08-19 07:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-08-18 19:47 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-08-18 19:47 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-08-18 19:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-08-18 01:51 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-08-18 01:51 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-08-18 01:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-08-17 12:47 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-08-17 12:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-08-17 01:17 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-08-17 01:17 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-08-17 01:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-08-16 13:47 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-08-16 13:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-08-16 02:17 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-16 02:17 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-16 02:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-15 14:48 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-08-15 14:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  48. 2026-08-15 03:18 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-08-15 03:18 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-08-15 03:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-08-14 15:48 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-08-14 15:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-08-14 04:19 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-08-14 04:19 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-08-14 04:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-08-13 16:49 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-08-13 16:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-08-13 05:17 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-08-13 05:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-08-12 17:46 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-08-12 17:46 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-12 17:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-08-12 06:17 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-12 06:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-08-11 18:46 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-08-11 18:46 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-08-11 18:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-08-11 07:16 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-08-11 07:16 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-11 07:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-08-10 19:47 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64045?
CVE-2026-64045 is a high vulnerability published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ovpn: tcp - use cached peer pointer in ovpntcpclose() ovpntcpclose() loads the ovpnsocket via rcudereferenceskuser_data() under rcureadlock(), takes a reference on sock->peer, caches the peer pointer in a local, and drops the read…
When was CVE-2026-64045 disclosed?
CVE-2026-64045 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 19, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-64045 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64045 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 95.2% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64045?
CVE-2026-64045 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 8.4 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64045?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-64045, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64045

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64045?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.