CVE-2026-64026

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-19. the CNA's CVSS baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

rxrpc: Fix DATA decrypt vs splice() by copying data to buffer in recvmsg

This improves the fix for CVE-2026-43500.

Fix the pagecache corruption from in-place decryption of a DATA packet transmitted locally by splice() by getting rid of the packet sharing in the I/O thread and unconditionally extracting the packet content into a bounce buffer in which the buffer is decrypted. recvmsg() (or the kernel equivalent) then copies the data from the bounce buffer to the destination buffer. The sk_buff then remains unmodified.

This has an additional advantage in that the packet is then arranged in the buffer with the correct alignment required for the crypto algorithms to process directly. The performance of the crypto does seem to be a little faster and, surprisingly, the unencrypted performance doesn't seem to change much - possibly due to removing complexity from the I/O thread.

Yet another advantage is that the I/O thread doesn't have to copy packets which would slow down packet distribution, ACK generation, etc..

The buffer belongs to the call and is allocated initially at 2K, sufficiently large to hold a whole jumbo subpacket, but the buffer will be increased in size if needed. However, to take this work, MSG_PEEK may cause a later packet to be decrypted into the buffer, in which case the earlier one will need re-decrypting for a subsequent recvmsg().

Note that rx_pkt_offset may legitimately see 0 as a valid offset now, so switch to using USHRT_MAX to indicate an invalid offset.

Note also that I would generally prefer to replace the buffers of the current sk_buff with a new kmalloc'd buffer of the right size, ditching the old data and frags as this makes the handling of MSG_PEEK easier and removes the re-decryption issue, but this looks like quite a complicated thing to achieve. skb_morph() looks half way to what I want, but I don't want to have to allocate a new sk_buff.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
4%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Jul 21, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

rxrpc: Fix DATA decrypt vs splice() by copying data to buffer in recvmsg - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d2bc90cf6c75cb96d2ce549be6c35efa3099d25b
generic

rxrpc: Fix DATA decrypt vs splice() by copying data to buffer in recvmsg - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c580087743712112778a06d65a4074053072d7bf
generic

rxrpc: Fix DATA decrypt vs splice() by copying data to buffer in recvmsg - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b94a6ccbaf1104dd980150a65fdeb2f69d17d2f5
generic

rxrpc: Fix DATA decrypt vs splice() by copying data to buffer in recvmsg - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a05bf6d9e621fa71e89ccebe3047ba45218d7b38
generic

rxrpc: Fix DATA decrypt vs splice() by copying data to buffer in recvmsg - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/46cb765e2e5ad52303ea157e10d370bb6b7acbbf

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64026(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(5)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (496 versions)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (335 versions)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)6.12.94-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (138 versions)7.0.12-1

All Vendor Advisories

(5)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 30× in last 7d / 159× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 210 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-30 02:52 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-30 02:52 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-30 02:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-27 21:23 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-27 21:23 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-08-27 21:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-27 03:38 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-27 03:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-26 15:18 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-26 15:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-26 02:53 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-26 02:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-25 14:32 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-25 14:32 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-25 14:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-25 02:11 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-25 02:11 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-25 02:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-24 13:53 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-24 13:53 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-24 13:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-24 01:35 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-24 01:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-23 13:16 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-08-23 13:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-23 00:54 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-23 00:54 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-08-23 00:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-22 12:35 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-22 12:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-22 00:16 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-22 00:16 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-22 00:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-21 11:58 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-21 11:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-20 23:40 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-20 23:40 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-20 23:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-20 11:21 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-20 11:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-19 23:01 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-19 23:01 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-08-19 23:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-08-19 10:15 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-08-19 10:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-18 21:50 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-08-18 21:50 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-08-18 21:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-08-18 09:31 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-08-18 09:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-08-17 21:12 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-08-17 21:12 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-17 21:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-08-17 08:53 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-08-17 08:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-08-16 20:35 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-08-16 20:35 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-08-16 20:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-08-16 08:16 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-08-16 08:16 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-16 08:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-15 19:58 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-08-15 19:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-08-15 07:39 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-08-15 07:39 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-08-15 07:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-08-14 19:20 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-08-14 19:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-08-14 06:58 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-08-14 06:58 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-08-14 06:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-08-13 18:39 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-08-13 18:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-08-13 06:21 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-13 06:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-08-12 18:03 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-08-12 18:03 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-12 18:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-08-12 05:44 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-08-12 05:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-08-11 17:25 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-08-11 17:25 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-11 17:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-08-11 05:03 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-08-11 05:03 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64026?
CVE-2026-64026 is a high vulnerability published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rxrpc: Fix DATA decrypt vs splice() by copying data to buffer in recvmsg This improves the fix for CVE-2026-43500. Fix the pagecache corruption from in-place decryption of a DATA packet transmitted locally by splice() by getting…
When was CVE-2026-64026 disclosed?
CVE-2026-64026 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 19, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-64026 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64026 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 96.3% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64026?
CVE-2026-64026 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 7.8 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64026?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-64026, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64026

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64026?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.